• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

名词前形容词在句义理解中的加工。

Processing prenominal adjectives during sentence comprehension.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Aug;111(1):141-57. doi: 10.2466/11.22.28.PMS.111.4.141-157.

DOI:10.2466/11.22.28.PMS.111.4.141-157
PMID:21058595
Abstract

The time course of semantic processing of two prenominal adjectives contained within a noun phrase was investigated. In English, the ordering of adjectives is determined by their meaning. Adjectives specifying color (e.g., red) generally follow adjectives that specify size (e.g., big) and adjectives that specify aspects of general description (e.g., young). In two experiments, reading time was measured on sentences containing a noun phrase in which the order of prenominal adjectives was varied. In Exp. 1, the adjectives specified size and color (e.g., the big red balloon vs the red big balloon). In Exp. 2, the adjectives specified general description and color (e.g., the pretty yellow dress vs the yellow pretty dress). The results of both experiments showed that the processing difficulty arising from comprehending an adjective order violation emerged before the head noun was processed, indicating that comprehenders semantically processed the meanings of prenominal adjectives prior to interpreting the meaning of the head noun.

摘要

研究了名词短语中包含的两个前置形容词的语义处理的时间进程。在英语中,形容词的顺序由它们的意思决定。指定颜色的形容词(如 red)通常位于指定大小的形容词(如 big)和指定一般描述方面的形容词(如 young)之后。在两项实验中,通过测量包含名词短语的句子的阅读时间来测量前置形容词的顺序变化。在实验 1 中,形容词指定了大小和颜色(例如,大红色气球与红色大气球)。在实验 2 中,形容词指定了一般描述和颜色(例如,漂亮的黄色连衣裙与黄色漂亮的连衣裙)。两个实验的结果都表明,理解形容词顺序违反所引起的处理困难出现在处理名词之前,这表明理解者在解释名词的意思之前就已经对前置形容词的意思进行了语义处理。

相似文献

1
Processing prenominal adjectives during sentence comprehension.名词前形容词在句义理解中的加工。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Aug;111(1):141-57. doi: 10.2466/11.22.28.PMS.111.4.141-157.
2
Prenominal adjective order is such a fat big deal because adjectives are ordered by likely need.前置形容词的顺序是一个非常重要的问题,因为形容词是按照可能的需求来排序的。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):122-138. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01769-w.
3
Scale structure: processing minimum standard and maximum standard scalar adjectives.量表结构:处理最小标准和最大标准标量形容词。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):299-324. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
4
Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.句子理解过程中句法与语义的相互作用:句法和语义违反相结合的事件相关电位效应
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807.
5
Children's use of syntactic and pragmatic knowledge in the interpretation of novel adjectives.儿童在理解新形容词时对句法和语用知识的运用。
Child Dev. 2006 Jan-Feb;77(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00853.x.
6
Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.通过上下文表示实现增量语义解释。
Cognition. 1999 Jun 22;71(2):109-47. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00025-6.
7
Behavioral and neural evidence on the processing of ambiguous adjective-noun dependencies in Korean sentence comprehension.关于韩语句子理解中模糊形容词 - 名词依存关系处理的行为和神经证据。
Brain Lang. 2019 Jan;188:28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
8
Online processing of sentences containing noun modification in young children with high-functioning autism.高功能自闭症幼儿对包含名词修饰的句子的在线处理
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Mar;51(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12191. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
9
Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.语境中的双语词汇通达:来自阅读过程中眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):381-90. doi: 10.1037/a0014875.
10
Composing lexical versus functional adjectives: Evidence for uniformity in the left temporal lobe.组合词汇性形容词和功能性形容词:左颞叶一致性的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2309-2322. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1469-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired. Evidence from multiple adjectives.通用语言层次结构并非天生固有。来自多个形容词的证据。
PeerJ. 2019 Aug 1;7:e7438. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7438. eCollection 2019.