Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
Am Psychol. 2010 Nov;65(8):768-79. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.65.8.768.
Interrogation-induced false confessions virtually guarantee that the innocent suspects who made them will be wrongly prosecuted and convicted. One widely endorsed recommendation for curbing such miscarriages of justice is to video record custodial interrogations in their entirety, the belief being that the resulting audiovisual record will enable trial fact finders to make more accurate assessments of the voluntariness and veracity of suspects' statements. Psychological science, however, highlights a variety of potential pitfalls associated with the video-recording practice. Some can be avoided with proper implementation of the practice, and in these instances research-based policy recommendations are provided to successfully accomplish this objective. Others, unfortunately, are not as easily sidestepped, and in these instances criminal-justice practitioners should heed the adage "Forewarned is forearmed" when making use of video-recorded interrogations.
审讯诱导的虚假供词几乎可以肯定会导致无辜的嫌疑人被错误起诉和定罪。为了遏制这种司法失误,一个被广泛认可的建议是对羁押审讯进行全程录像,其依据是,由此产生的视听记录将使审判事实调查者能够更准确地评估嫌疑人陈述的自愿性和真实性。然而,心理学科学强调了与录像做法相关的各种潜在陷阱。有些陷阱可以通过正确实施该做法来避免,在这些情况下,提供了基于研究的政策建议,以成功实现这一目标。其他陷阱则不太容易回避,在这些情况下,刑事司法从业人员在使用录像审讯时应该牢记“有备无患”这句谚语。