Fagan J
Criminal Justice Center, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY.
Violence Vict. 1988 Fall;3(3):159-86.
Criminal justice policy on family violence has evolved over the past two decades, informed by political activism as well as theory and research from divergent and often competing perspectives. Experimental research on mandatory arrest of men who assault female partners, policy research on special prosecution programs, and the development of treatment programs for men who batter, typify the strategies for applying criminal sanctions to family violence. However, other critical research on family violence has not been integrated into criminal justice policy, limiting policy development and intervention strategies to practices which reflect contemporary models of sanctions and social control. The limited contributions of family violence research to criminal justice policy reflect competing paradigms of social science, the challenge of family violence cases to the normative processes and the social organization of the criminal courts, and divergent perspectives on social control of offenders in family and stranger violence cases. Strategies for an integrated policy development process are suggested.
在过去二十年中,家庭暴力方面的刑事司法政策不断演变,受到政治激进主义以及来自不同且往往相互竞争的视角的理论和研究的影响。针对袭击女性伴侣的男性实施强制逮捕的实证研究、关于特别起诉计划的政策研究以及为殴打他人的男性制定的治疗计划,是对家庭暴力适用刑事制裁的典型策略。然而,其他关于家庭暴力的关键研究尚未纳入刑事司法政策,将政策制定和干预策略局限于反映当代制裁和社会控制模式的做法。家庭暴力研究对刑事司法政策的贡献有限,这反映了社会科学的相互竞争范式、家庭暴力案件对刑事法院规范程序和社会组织的挑战,以及在家庭和陌生人暴力案件中对犯罪者社会控制的不同观点。本文提出了综合政策制定过程的策略。