• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于重症肌无力的治疗选择的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of therapeutic options used for myasthenia gravis.

机构信息

Neurological Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):797-805. doi: 10.1002/ana.22139.

DOI:10.1002/ana.22139
PMID:21061395
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical and economic outcomes following plasma exchange (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in U.S. patients with primary diagnoses of myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

Our cohort was identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for years 2000-2005 using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition. Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify predictors of mortality, complications, length of stay, and total inpatient cost.

RESULTS

Among 1,606 hospitalized patients, the unadjusted mortality rate of MG crisis remained higher than those without crisis (0.44% vs 4.44%, p < 0.001), as well as the unadjusted complication rate (26.36% vs 11.23%, p < 0.001). MG crisis patients receiving PLEX had significantly more complications than those receiving IVIG (30.06% vs 14.79%, p < 0.001). Among the whole cohort, adjusted mortality and complication rates were not significantly different between the treatment groups (p > 0.05). Acute respiratory failure, major cardiac complications, and acute renal failure were associated with an increased mortality rate (p < 0.001). Age and respiratory failure were associated with an increased complication rate (p < 0.001). Length of stay was significantly longer for MG (6 vs 4 days, p < 0.001) and MG crisis (10 vs 5 days, p < 0.001) patients receiving PLEX. Inpatient costs were higher for MG ($26,662 vs $21,124, p < 0.01) and MG crisis ($53,801 vs $33,924, p < 0.001) patients receiving PLEX.

INTERPRETATION

Compared to PLEX, IVIG appears of similar clinical (mortality and complications) and perhaps of superior economic (length of stay and total inpatient charges) outcomes in the treatment of MG. Elderly and those with complex comorbid diseases including acute respiratory failure may be better treated with IVIG.

摘要

目的

比较美国原发性重症肌无力(MG)患者行血浆置换(PLEX)和静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)的临床和经济结局。

方法

我们的队列是从 2000 年至 2005 年全国住院患者样本数据库中使用国际疾病分类第 9 版代码确定的。采用多变量回归分析来确定死亡率、并发症、住院时间和总住院费用的预测因素。

结果

在 1606 例住院患者中,MG 危象患者的未调整死亡率高于非危象患者(0.44% vs 4.44%,p < 0.001),未调整并发症发生率也高于非危象患者(26.36% vs 11.23%,p < 0.001)。接受 PLEX 的 MG 危象患者的并发症发生率明显高于接受 IVIG 的患者(30.06% vs 14.79%,p < 0.001)。在整个队列中,两组间治疗的调整死亡率和并发症发生率无显著差异(p > 0.05)。急性呼吸衰竭、主要心脏并发症和急性肾功能衰竭与死亡率增加相关(p < 0.001)。年龄和呼吸衰竭与并发症发生率增加相关(p < 0.001)。MG(6 天 vs 4 天,p < 0.001)和 MG 危象(10 天 vs 5 天,p < 0.001)患者接受 PLEX 的住院时间显著延长。MG(26662 美元 vs 21124 美元,p < 0.01)和 MG 危象(53801 美元 vs 33924 美元,p < 0.001)患者接受 PLEX 的住院费用更高。

结论

与 PLEX 相比,IVIG 在治疗 MG 方面的临床结局(死亡率和并发症)可能相似,而在经济结局(住院时间和总住院费用)方面可能更优。对于老年患者和合并急性呼吸衰竭等复杂合并症的患者,IVIG 可能是更好的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of therapeutic options used for myasthenia gravis.用于重症肌无力的治疗选择的比较分析。
Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):797-805. doi: 10.1002/ana.22139.
2
Plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis crisis in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.朱拉隆功国王纪念医院治疗重症肌无力危象的血浆置换或静脉注射免疫球蛋白疗法
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Apr;92(4):478-82.
3
Predictors of response to immunomodulation in patients with myasthenia gravis.预测重症肌无力患者对免疫调节治疗的反应。
Muscle Nerve. 2012 May;45(5):648-52. doi: 10.1002/mus.23236.
4
IVIG Versus PLEX in the Treatment of Worsening Myasthenia Gravis: What is the Evidence?: A Critically Appraised Topic.静脉注射免疫球蛋白与血浆置换治疗重症肌无力病情恶化:证据何在?:一项严格评价主题
Neurologist. 2015 May;19(5):145-8. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000026.
5
Comparing the autoantibody levels and clinical efficacy of double filtration plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, and intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of late-onset myasthenia gravis.比较双重过滤血浆置换、免疫吸附和静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗晚发型重症肌无力的自身抗体水平及临床疗效。
Ther Apher Dial. 2010 Apr;14(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00751.x.
6
Changes in quality of life scores with intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis in patients with myasthenia gravis.静脉注射免疫球蛋白或血浆置换治疗重症肌无力患者的生活质量评分变化。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;84(1):94-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301449. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
7
A comparison of the effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange as preoperative therapy of myasthenia gravis.静脉注射免疫球蛋白与血浆置换作为重症肌无力术前治疗方法的疗效比较。
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2008 Mar;9(3):352-5. doi: 10.1097/CND.0b013e3181660807.
8
Comparison of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin as maintenance therapies for juvenile myasthenia gravis.比较血浆置换和静脉注射免疫球蛋白作为小儿重症肌无力的维持治疗。
JAMA Neurol. 2014 May;71(5):575-80. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.17.
9
Outcome of plasmapheresis in myasthenia gravis: delayed therapy is not favorable.血浆置换治疗重症肌无力的结局:延迟治疗不利。
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Apr;43(4):578-84. doi: 10.1002/mus.21924.
10
Safety of plasma exchange therapy in patients with myasthenia gravis.血浆置换疗法在重症肌无力患者中的安全性。
Muscle Nerve. 2013 Apr;47(4):510-4. doi: 10.1002/mus.23626. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A narrative review of the economic burden of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease and analogous conditions.髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体相关疾病及类似病症经济负担的叙述性综述。
Front Neurol. 2025 May 30;16:1506465. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1506465. eCollection 2025.
2
Myasthenia gravis: understanding treatment patterns and direct medical costs in the Czech Republic.重症肌无力:了解捷克共和国的治疗模式及直接医疗费用。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Dec 20;19(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03504-3.
3
Medical costs of treating myasthenia gravis in patients who need intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) - a register-based study.
对需要静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)的重症肌无力患者进行治疗的医疗费用——一项基于登记的研究。
J Neurol. 2024 Dec 12;272(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12768-5.
4
Efgartigimod versus intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of patients with impending myasthenic crisis.依氟鸟氨酸治疗即将发生肌无力危象的患者:与静脉注射免疫球蛋白的对比。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 18;14(1):28394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79918-7.
5
Risk-Benefit Analysis of Novel Treatments for Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.新型治疗方案治疗全身性重症肌无力患者的风险效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Dec;41(12):4628-4647. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03014-5. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
6
Bleeding recurrence risk among hospitalized patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange: a multi-center study.住院患者行治疗性血浆置换后出血复发风险:一项多中心研究。
Blood Transfus. 2024 Sep;22(5):420-428. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.722. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Rescue Treatment with Plasma Exchange in Patients with Acute Inflammatory Neurological Disorders: A Single Center Experience.血浆置换对急性炎症性神经疾病患者的抢救治疗效果及安全性:单中心经验
Neurol Int. 2024 Jul 10;16(4):761-775. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16040056.
8
Predictors of High Healthcare Cost Among Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Combined Machine Learning and Regression Approach from a US Payer Perspective.从美国支付方的角度来看,预测全身性重症肌无力患者医疗费用高的因素:一种结合机器学习和回归方法的研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Sep;22(5):735-747. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00897-x. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
9
Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment.乙酰胆碱受体抗体阳性的全身性重症肌无力:治疗指南。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 May;31(5):e16229. doi: 10.1111/ene.16229. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
10
Successful Emergency Management of a Dog with Ventilator-Dependent Acquired Myasthenia Gravis with Immunoadsorption.通过免疫吸附成功急诊处理一只依赖呼吸机的获得性重症肌无力犬。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Dec 21;14(1):33. doi: 10.3390/ani14010033.