Nezlin L P
Ontogenez. 2010 Sep-Oct;41(5):370-80.
Immunochemical labeling of neuronal elements and laser confocal microscopy have considerably expanded the capacity of comparative morphology and allowed us to monitor the neurogenesis of various trochophore animals at the level of individual identified neurons and their projections. It has been demonstrated that many generally accepted concepts of the larval nervous system and the phylogenetic theories constructed on this basis are incorrect. Comparative analysis has demonstrated that the orthogonal brain is absent at all developmental stages in the representative Lophotrochozoa members. Fundamental differences in the structure and development of the nervous system have been found in the trochophores belonging to different taxonomic groups within Lophotrochozoa; these differences demonstrate that the trochophore larva in these groups are not homologous, while their similarity is most likely a result of convergence. Our results challenge the concept of trochophore as the ancestral form common for all trochophore animals. It is necessary to exclude from phylogenetic discussions the orthogon as a basic plan for the structure of the nervous system and the trochophore as an ancestral form for all Lophtrochozoa.
神经元成分的免疫化学标记和激光共聚焦显微镜技术极大地扩展了比较形态学的能力,使我们能够在单个已识别神经元及其投射水平上监测各种担轮幼虫动物的神经发生。已经证明,许多关于幼虫神经系统的普遍接受的概念以及在此基础上构建的系统发育理论是不正确的。比较分析表明,在典型的冠轮动物成员的所有发育阶段都不存在正交脑。在冠轮动物门内不同分类群的担轮幼虫中发现了神经系统结构和发育的根本差异;这些差异表明这些类群中的担轮幼虫并非同源,而它们的相似性很可能是趋同的结果。我们的结果挑战了担轮幼虫是所有担轮幼虫动物共同祖先形式的概念。有必要在系统发育讨论中排除将正交结构作为神经系统的基本结构模式以及将担轮幼虫作为所有冠轮动物祖先形式的观点。