Nutritional support in surgical practice: Part I.

Critical evaluation of the therapeutic benefit gained from provision of nutritional support requires knowledge regarding the nutritional status of those to whom it was given. The apparent effect of giving parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition depends not only on how much and how well it is given, but also on how depleted the recipient is. Thus, nutritional assessment requires close examination before proceeding to assess the efficacy and potential benefits of the remedial measures of parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition. Although preoperative malnutrition is associated with a poor operative outcome, there appears to be no consensus as to whether perioperative nutritional support can reduce postoperative complications to the level occurring in well-nourished patients undergoing similar procedures. This is partly because reports evaluating the effect of perioperative nutritional support on postoperative outcome vary widely as to numbers of patients studied, primary diagnoses, and the duration and quality of perioperative nutritional support. In Part I, these issues are explored in patients who are undergoing operations for cancer, trauma, or burns. Enteral nutrition appears to be as effective as parenteral nutrition in improving operative outcome, as compared with ad libitum oral nutrition. Postoperative enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition are equally effective in reducing postoperative complications.