Liu Meng-Yu, Peng Jin, Jiang Miao
Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2010 Oct;30(10):1101-4.
As the stands, one-sidedness of subjective understanding and subjective bias is surely existed in the study of Chinese medicine (CM) doctors' experiences, so to find appropriate methods for inheriting the real experiences of experts is needed. Since CM thinking presents as a system integral way of intention thinking and a mental process of subject, to study CM experts' experiences in virtue of Q method, a psychological research method for the subjective sense, must be feasible. The application of Q method was inspected in this article, it was considered to be capable of sorting the experts, integrating the opinions of experts and comparing their opinions from multi-pointviews. A test investigation was carried out by applying Q method to analyze the CM measures, getting from some chosen gynecology specialists, for regain pregnancy in women underwent spontaneous abortion, for exploring the applicative value of Q method in the co-cognizance formation of experts' experiences.
如前所述，中医医生经验研究中肯定存在主观认识的片面性和主观偏差，因此需要找到合适的方法来传承专家的真实经验。由于中医思维呈现为意向思维的系统整体方式和主体的心理过程，借助Q方法（一种用于主观感受的心理学研究方法）来研究中医专家的经验必然是可行的。本文考察了Q方法的应用，认为它能够对专家进行分类，整合专家意见并从多个角度比较他们的意见。通过应用Q方法对部分妇科专家针对自然流产后妇女再次怀孕的中医措施进行分析，开展了一项测试调查，以探索Q方法在专家经验共同认知形成中的应用价值。
