Suppr超能文献

超声内镜在胆管癌术前评估中的作用:一项大型单中心经验。

Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.050. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remain difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of EUS in the diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of CCA.

DESIGN

Observational study of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with CCA from January 2003 through October 2009.

INTERVENTIONS

EUS and EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Sensitivity of EUS for the detection of a tumor and prediction of unresectability compared with CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); sensitivity of EUS-FNA to provide tissue diagnosis, by using surgical pathology as a reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients with biliary strictures undergoing EUS were identified. Of these, 81 (mean age 70 years, 45 men) had CCA. Fifty-one patients (63%) had distal and 30 (37%) had proximal CCA. For those with available imaging, tumor detection was superior with EUS compared with triphasic CT (76 of 81 [94%] vs 23 of 75 [30%], respectively; P < .001). MRI identified the tumor in 11 of 26 patients (42%; P = .07 vs EUS). EUS identified CCA in all 51 (100%) distal and 25 (83%) of 30 proximal tumors (P < .01). EUS-FNA (median, 5 passes; range, 1-12 passes) was performed in 74 patients (91%). The overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of CCA was 73% (95% confidence interval, 62%-82%) and was significantly higher in distal compared with proximal CCA (81% vs 59%, respectively; P = .04). Fifteen tumors were definitely unresectable. EUS correctly identified unresectability in 8 of 15 and correctly identified the 38 of 39 patients with resectable tumors (53% sensitivity and 97% specificity for unresectability). CT and/or MRI failed to detect unresectability in 6 of these 8 patients.

LIMITATION

Single-center study.

CONCLUSION

EUS and EUS-FNA are sensitive for the diagnosis of CCA and very specific in predicting unresectability. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA is significantly higher in distal than in proximal CCA.

摘要

背景

准确的术前诊断和分期胆管癌(CCA)仍然困难。

目的

评估 EUS 在诊断和 CCA 的术前评估中的作用。

设计

前瞻性收集数据的观察性研究。

地点

印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯的一家三级转诊医院。

患者

2003 年 1 月至 2009 年 10 月连续 CCA 患者。

干预措施

EUS 和 EUS 引导下的 FNA(EUS-FNA)。

主要观察指标

EUS 检测肿瘤的敏感性和预测不可切除性与 CT 和磁共振成像(MRI)的比较;EUS-FNA 提供组织诊断的敏感性,以手术病理学为参考标准。

结果

共确定 228 例胆道狭窄患者行 EUS 检查。其中,81 例(平均年龄 70 岁,45 例男性)患有 CCA。51 例(63%)患者为远端 CCA,30 例(37%)为近端 CCA。对于有可用影像学检查的患者,与三阶段 CT 相比,EUS 检测肿瘤的敏感性更高(76/81 [94%] 与 23/75 [30%],分别;P <.001)。MRI 检出 26 例患者中的 11 例(42%;P =.07 与 EUS)。EUS 检出 51 例(100%)远端和 30 例(83%)近端肿瘤的所有 CCA(P <.01)。EUS-FNA(中位数,5 次;范围,1-12 次)在 74 例患者(91%)中进行。EUS-FNA 诊断 CCA 的总敏感性为 73%(95%置信区间,62%-82%),在远端 CCA 中明显高于近端 CCA(81%与 59%,分别;P =.04)。15 个肿瘤绝对不可切除。EUS 正确识别不可切除性的 8 例中有 8 例,正确识别 39 例可切除肿瘤中的 38 例(不可切除性的 53%敏感性和 97%特异性)。在这些患者中,6 例 CT 和/或 MRI 未能检测到不可切除性。

局限性

单中心研究。

结论

EUS 和 EUS-FNA 对 CCA 的诊断具有较高的敏感性,对不可切除性的预测具有非常特异性。EUS-FNA 在远端 CCA 中的敏感性明显高于近端 CCA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验