Suppr超能文献

一天不活动对健康男性和女性胰岛素作用的影响:与能量摄入的相互作用。

Effects of 1 day of inactivity on insulin action in healthy men and women: interaction with energy intake.

机构信息

Energy Metabolism Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.

出版信息

Metabolism. 2011 Jul;60(7):941-9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.08.014. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

Abstract

Prolonged periods of limited muscle activity can reduce insulin action. Acute changes in low muscle activity (ie, sitting) have not been assessed. In addition, unless energy intake is reduced during sitting to match low expenditure, the concurrent energy surplus may explain lower insulin action. The objective of the study was to evaluate the acute effect of sitting, with and without energy surplus, on insulin action. Fourteen young (26.1 ± 4.5 years, mean ± SD), nonobese (23.7% ± 7.1% fat), fit (peak oxygen consumption = 49.1 ± 3.3 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)) men (n = 7) and women (n = 7) completed three 24-hour conditions: (1) an active, no-sitting condition (high energy expenditure of 2944 ± 124 kcal with energy intake matched to expenditure) = NO-SIT; (2) low energy expenditure (sitting) of 2195 ± 121 kcal with no reduction in energy intake (energy surplus) = SIT; and (3) sitting with energy intake reduced to 2139 ± 118 kcal to match low expenditure (energy balance) = SIT-BAL. Insulin action was measured the following morning during a continuous infusion of [6,6-(2)H]-glucose. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with planned contrasts. Compared with NO-SIT, insulin action, defined as whole-body rate of glucose disappearance normalized to mean plasma insulin, was reduced by 39% in SIT (P < .001) and by 18% in SIT-BAL (P = .07). Insulin action was higher in SIT-BAL compared with SIT (P = .04). One day of sitting considerably reduced insulin action; this effect was minimized, but not prevented, when energy intake was reduced to match expenditure. Strategies to limit daily sitting may reduce metabolic disease risk.

摘要

长时间的有限肌肉活动会降低胰岛素的作用。低肌肉活动(例如,坐着)的急性变化尚未得到评估。此外,除非在坐着期间减少能量摄入以匹配低支出,否则同时存在的能量过剩可能解释了较低的胰岛素作用。该研究的目的是评估坐着、有和没有能量过剩对胰岛素作用的急性影响。14 名年轻(26.1 ± 4.5 岁,平均值 ± 标准差)、非肥胖(23.7% ± 7.1%脂肪)、健康(峰值耗氧量 = 49.1 ± 3.3 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1))的男性(n = 7)和女性(n = 7)完成了三种 24 小时的条件:(1)活跃,不坐的条件(高能量消耗 2944 ± 124 kcal,能量摄入与支出相匹配)= 不坐;(2)低能量消耗(坐着)2195 ± 121 kcal,不减少能量摄入(能量过剩)= 坐;(3)摄入能量减少到 2139 ± 118 kcal,以匹配低支出(能量平衡)= 坐-平衡。第二天早上,通过持续输注 [6,6-(2)H]-葡萄糖来测量胰岛素作用。使用线性混合效应模型和计划对比分析数据。与不坐相比,SIT 时全身葡萄糖清除率与平均血浆胰岛素标准化的胰岛素作用降低了 39%(P <.001),SIT-BAL 时降低了 18%(P =.07)。SIT-BAL 时的胰岛素作用高于 SIT(P =.04)。一天的坐姿大大降低了胰岛素作用;当能量摄入减少以匹配支出时,这种影响最小化,但不能完全避免。限制日常坐姿的策略可能会降低代谢性疾病的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验