Nakahara T, Matsuo S, Fukushima S, Kurokawa T
Appl Opt. 1996 Feb 10;35(5):860-71. doi: 10.1364/AO.35.000860.
We compared multiple-quantum-well modulator-based smart pixels and vertical-cavity-surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) based smart pixels in terms of optical switching power, switching speed, and electric-power consumption. Optoelectronic circuits integrating GaAs field-effect transistors are designed for smart pixels of both types under the condition that each pixel has an optical threshold and gain. It is shown that both types perform maximum throughput of ~3 Tbps/cm(2). In regard to design flexibility, the modulator type is advantageous because switching time can be reduced by supplying large electric power, whereas switching time and electric-power consumption are limited to larger than certain values in the VCSEL type. In contrast, in regard to optical implementation, the VCSEL type is advantageous because it does not need an external bias-light source, whereas the modulator type needs bias-light arrays that must be precisely located because the small modulator diameter, <10 µm, is essential to high-speed operation. A bias-light source that increases the total power consumption of the system may offset the advantages of the modulator type.
我们在光开关功率、开关速度和电力消耗方面,对基于多量子阱调制器的智能像素和基于垂直腔面发射激光器(VCSEL)的智能像素进行了比较。在每个像素具有光学阈值和增益的条件下,为这两种类型的智能像素设计了集成砷化镓场效应晶体管的光电电路。结果表明,这两种类型的最大吞吐量均约为3 Tbps/cm²。在设计灵活性方面,调制器类型具有优势,因为通过提供大功率可以减少开关时间,而在VCSEL类型中,开关时间和电力消耗被限制在大于特定值的范围内。相比之下,在光学实现方面,VCSEL类型具有优势,因为它不需要外部偏置光源,而调制器类型需要偏置光阵列,由于调制器直径小(<10 µm)对高速运行至关重要,所以这些偏置光阵列必须精确定位。增加系统总功耗的偏置光源可能会抵消调制器类型的优势。