Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Av., Cambridge, 02139 MA, USA.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 Jan 21;13(3):1002-11. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00516a. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
The use of empirical force fields is now a standard approach in predicting the properties of hydrated oxides which are omnipresent in both natural and engineering applications. Transferability of force fields to analogous hydrated oxides without rigorous investigations may result in misleading property predictions. Herein, we focus on two common empirical force fields, the simple point charge ClayFF potential and the core-shell potential to study tobermorite minerals, the most prominent family of Calcium-Silicate-Hydrates that are complex hydrated oxides. We benchmark the predictive capabilities of these force fields against first principles results. While the structural information seem to be in close agreement with DFT results, we find that for higher order properties such as elastic constants, the core-shell potential quantitatively improves upon the simple point charge model, and shows a larger degree of transferability to complex materials. In return, to remedy the deficiencies of the simple point charge potential for hydrated calcio-silicates, we suggest using both structural data and elasticity data for potential calibration, a new force field potential, CSH-FF. This re-parameterized version of ClayFF is then applied to simulating an atomistic model of cement (Pellenq et al., PNAS, 2009). We demonstrate that this force field improves the predictive capabilities of ClayFF, being considerably less computational intensive than the core-shell model.
目前,在预测水合氧化物的性质方面,经验力场的使用已成为一种标准方法,因为水合氧化物在自然和工程应用中无处不在。如果不进行严格的研究就将力场转移到类似的水合氧化物上,可能会导致对性质的误导性预测。本文中,我们专注于两种常见的经验力场,即简单点电荷 ClayFF 势和核壳势,以研究托贝莫来石矿物,这是钙-硅-水化物中最突出的家族,也是复杂的水合氧化物。我们将这些力场的预测能力与第一性原理结果进行基准测试。虽然结构信息似乎与 DFT 结果非常吻合,但我们发现,对于更高阶的性质,如弹性常数,核壳势在定量上优于简单点电荷模型,并且对复杂材料的迁移性更大。作为对简单点电荷水合钙硅酸盐势的修正,我们建议同时使用结构数据和弹性数据进行势校准,得到一个新的力场 CSH-FF。对 ClayFF 进行重新参数化后,我们将其应用于模拟水泥的原子模型(Pellenq 等人,PNAS,2009)。我们证明了该力场提高了 ClayFF 的预测能力,而且计算强度明显低于核壳模型。