Sarmah Ajit K, Rohan Maheswaran
Soil Chemical & Biological interactions, Soils and Landscape Team, Landcare Research Manaaki Whenua, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand.
J Environ Monit. 2011 Jan;13(1):157-66. doi: 10.1039/c0em00401d. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
The performance of four mathematical models (hockey stick, biexponential, first-order double exponential decay, and first-order two-compartment) was evaluated to describe the dissipation kinetics for 4-n-nonylphenol (4-n-NP) and bisphenol-A (BPA) in groundwater-aquifer material slurry under aerobic and anaerobic conditions conducted under controlled laboratory conditions. The fit of each model to the measured values under both conditions was tested using an array of statistical indices to judge the model's ability to fit the measured datasets. Corresponding 50% (DT(50)) and 90% (DT(90)) dissipation values for each compound were numerically obtained and compared against each model. The model derived DT(50) values in groundwater-aquifer material ranged from 1.06 to 1.24 (4-n-NP) and 0.341 to 0.568 days (BPA) under aerobic condition, while they were 2- to 4-fold higher under anoxic condition. DT(90) values for 4-n-NP ranged anywhere between 2.3 and 4.45 days under both conditions, while DT(90) values for BPA ranged from around 1 day to as high as 12 days under both conditions tested. A visual examination of the measured and fitted plots as well as the statistical indices showed that, with the exception of the hockey stick model, the models performed satisfactorily. Despite having only 3 parameters, the biexponential model could describe the dissipation kinetics very well and this was supported by the statistical indices generated for each case.
在可控实验室条件下,对四种数学模型(曲棍球棒模型、双指数模型、一阶双指数衰减模型和一阶二室模型)进行了评估,以描述4-正壬基酚(4-n-NP)和双酚A(BPA)在需氧和厌氧条件下于地下水-含水层材料浆液中的消散动力学。使用一系列统计指标测试了每种模型在两种条件下与测量值的拟合情况,以判断模型拟合测量数据集的能力。数值计算得到了每种化合物相应的50%(DT(50))和90%(DT(90))消散值,并与每种模型进行了比较。在需氧条件下,模型得出的地下水-含水层材料中DT(50)值范围为1.06至1.24(4-n-NP)和0.341至0.568天(BPA),而在缺氧条件下则高出2至4倍。两种条件下4-n-NP的DT(90)值在2.3至4.45天之间,而两种测试条件下BPA的DT(90)值范围从约1天到高达12天。对测量和拟合曲线以及统计指标的直观检查表明,除曲棍球棒模型外,其他模型表现令人满意。尽管双指数模型只有3个参数,但它能很好地描述消散动力学,这得到了每种情况下生成的统计指标的支持。