Suppr超能文献

基于社区的干预措施包,用于降低孕产妇和新生儿发病率及死亡率,并改善新生儿结局。

Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes.

作者信息

Lassi Zohra S, Haider Batool A, Bhutta Zulfiqar A

机构信息

Division of Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, Karachi, Pakistan, 74800.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10(11):CD007754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007754.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While maternal, infant and under-five child mortality rates in developing countries have declined significantly in the past two to three decades, newborn mortality rates have reduced much more slowly. While it is recognised that almost half of the newborn deaths can be prevented by scaling up evidence-based available interventions such as tetanus toxoid immunisation to mothers; clean and skilled care at delivery; newborn resuscitation; exclusive breastfeeding; clean umbilical cord care; management of infections in newborns, many require facility based and outreach services. It has also been stated that a significant proportion of these mortalities and morbidities could also be potentially addressed by developing community-based packages interventions which should also be supplemented by developing and strengthening linkages with the local health systems. Some of the recent community-based studies of interventions targeting women of reproductive age have shown variable impacts on maternal outcomes and hence it is uncertain if these strategies have consistent benefit across the continuum of maternal and newborn care.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of community-based intervention packages in reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality; and improving neonatal outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2010), World Bank's JOLIS (12 January 2010), BLDS at IDS and IDEAS database of unpublished working papers (12 January 2010), Google and Google Scholar (12 January 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All prospective randomised and quasi-experimental trials evaluating the effectiveness of community-based intervention packages in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidities; and improving neonatal outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included 18 cluster-randomised/quasi-randomised trials, covering a wide range of interventional packages, including two subsets from one trial. We incorporated data from these trials using generic inverse variance method in which logarithms of risk ratio estimates were used along with the standard error of the logarithms of risk ratio estimates. Our review did not show any reduction in maternal mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.02, random-effects (10 studies, n = 144,956), I² 39%, P value 0.10. However, significant reduction was observed in maternal morbidity (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92, random-effects (four studies, n = 138,290), I² 28%; neonatal mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.84, random-effects (12 studies, n = 136,425), I² 69%, P value < 0.001), stillbirths (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97, random-effects (11studies, n = 113,821), I² 66%, P value 0.001) and perinatal mortality (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.91, random-effects (10 studies, n = 110,291), I² 82%, P value < 0.001) as a consequence of implementation of community-based interventional care packages. It also increased the referrals to health facility for pregnancy related complication by 40% (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.65, fixed-effect (two studies, n = 22,800), I² 0%, P value 0.76), and improved the rates of early breastfeeding by 94% (RR 1.94; 95% CI 1.56 to 2.42, random-effects (six studies, n = 20,627), I² 97%, P value < 0.001). We assessed our primary outcomes for publication bias, but observed no such asymmetry on the funnel plot.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our review offers encouraging evidence of the value of integrating maternal and newborn care in community settings through a range of interventions which can be packaged effectively for delivery through a range of community health workers and health promotion groups. While the importance of skilled delivery and facility-based services for maternal and newborn care cannot be denied, there is sufficient evidence to scale up community-based care through packages which can be delivered by a range of community-based workers.

摘要

背景

在过去二三十年里,发展中国家孕产妇、婴儿及五岁以下儿童死亡率显著下降,但新生儿死亡率下降速度要慢得多。虽然人们认识到,通过扩大基于证据的现有干预措施,如为母亲接种破伤风类毒素疫苗、分娩时提供清洁且有技能的护理、新生儿复苏、纯母乳喂养、清洁脐带护理以及新生儿感染管理等,几乎一半的新生儿死亡是可以预防的,但许多措施需要基于医疗机构的服务和外展服务。也有人指出,通过制定基于社区的一揽子干预措施,很大一部分此类死亡和发病情况也有可能得到解决,并且还应通过发展和加强与当地卫生系统的联系来加以补充。最近一些针对育龄妇女的基于社区的干预研究对孕产妇结局的影响各不相同,因此不确定这些策略在孕产妇和新生儿护理的整个连续过程中是否具有一致的益处。

目的

评估基于社区的干预措施在降低孕产妇和新生儿发病率及死亡率以及改善新生儿结局方面的有效性。

检索策略

我们检索了考克兰妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2010年1月)、世界银行的JOLIS(2010年1月12日)、发展研究所的BLDS以及未发表工作论文的IDEAS数据库(2010年1月12日)、谷歌和谷歌学术(2010年1月12日)。

选择标准

所有评估基于社区的干预措施在降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率及发病率以及改善新生儿结局方面有效性的前瞻性随机和准实验性试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。

主要结果

该综述纳入了18项整群随机/准随机试验,涵盖了广泛的干预措施组合,包括一项试验中的两个子集。我们使用通用逆方差法将这些试验的数据合并,其中风险比估计值的对数与风险比估计值对数的标准误差一起使用。我们的综述未显示孕产妇死亡率有任何降低(风险比(RR)0.77;95%置信区间(CI)0.59至1.02,随机效应(10项研究,n = 144,956),I² 39%,P值0.10)。然而,观察到孕产妇发病率有显著降低(RR 0.75;95% CI 0.61至0.92,随机效应(4项研究,n = 138,290),I² 28%);新生儿死亡率(RR 0.76;95% CI 0.68至0.84,随机效应(12项研究,n = 136,425),I² 69%,P值<0.001)、死产率(RR 0.84;95% CI 0.74至0.97,随机效应(11项研究,n = 113,821),I² 66%,P值0.001)以及围产期死亡率(RR 0.80;95% CI 0.71至0.91,随机效应(10项研究,n = 110,291),I² 82%,P值<0.001),这是实施基于社区的干预性护理措施的结果。它还使因妊娠相关并发症转诊至医疗机构的比例增加了40%(RR 1.40;95% CI 1.19至1.65,固定效应(2项研究,n = 22,800),I² 0%,P值0.76),并使早期母乳喂养率提高了94%(RR 1.94;95% CI 1.56至2.42,随机效应(6项研究,n = 20,627),I² 97%,P值<0.001)。我们评估了主要结局的发表偏倚,但在漏斗图上未观察到此类不对称性。

作者结论

我们的综述提供了令人鼓舞的证据,表明通过一系列干预措施在社区环境中整合孕产妇和新生儿护理具有价值,这些干预措施可以有效地打包,通过一系列社区卫生工作者和健康促进团体进行实施。虽然熟练接生和基于医疗机构的孕产妇和新生儿护理服务的重要性不可否认,但有充分证据表明,可以通过一系列社区工作者能够提供的一揽子措施来扩大基于社区的护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验