Wilson A
Department of General Practice, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre.
BMJ. 1990 Feb 10;300(6721):376-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6721.376.
To assess changes in the organisation and performance of cervical cytology programmes in the practices of members of the Vale of Trent faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
Retrospective audits completed in 1985 and 1988 by general practitioners on a sequential sample of 100 records of women aged 35-64 in their practice.
General practices in which one or more partners were members or associates of the Vale of Trent faculty of the college, of which 76 participated in the first audit and 55 (82% of 67 eligible practices) in the second.
Sequential samples of 100 women born between 1 January 1920 and 31 December 1949 (first audit) and between 1 January 1923 and 31 December 1952 (second audit) whose surnames began with P or B respectively.
Percentage of women in each practice with a record of cervical cytology performed in the previous five years and percentage with no recorded smear.
Of the 76 practices completing the audit in 1985, 55 (82% of those eligible) repeated the exercise in 1988. Performance was not significantly different in practices that did and did not respond. The median percentage of women who had had a smear in the previous five years was 49% and 69% in 1985 and 1988 respectively (p less than 0.001) and that of women with no record of a cervical smear was 28% and 16% respectively (p less than 0.001). All but six practices showed improvement in both outcome measures. In both audits an active call system was associated with a significantly increased performance (p less than 0.05). In nine practices (16%) 80% or more of the samples of women had had a smear in the previous five years.
Organisation and performance of practices audited improved between 1985 and 1988. Although this might result from participation in the first audit, it probably represents a more general trend within primary care.
Between the two audits more practices (87% v 67%) had developed a policy on screening, and this was more likely to include the aim of performing regular smears on all sexually active women (98% v 80%).
评估皇家全科医师学院特伦特河谷分院成员诊所中宫颈细胞学检查项目的组织与实施情况的变化。
1985年和1988年由全科医师对其诊所中按序抽取的100例年龄在35 - 64岁女性的记录进行回顾性审核。
诊所中一个或多个合伙人是该学院特伦特河谷分院成员或准成员的全科诊所,其中76家参与了首次审核,55家(67家符合条件诊所中的82%)参与了第二次审核。
按序抽取的100名女性,她们分别出生于1920年1月1日至1949年12月31日(首次审核)以及1923年1月1日至1952年12月31日(第二次审核),姓氏分别以P或B开头。
每家诊所中在过去五年内有宫颈细胞学检查记录的女性百分比以及无涂片记录的女性百分比。
1985年完成审核的76家诊所中,55家(符合条件诊所中的82%)在1988年重复了此项工作。有回应和无回应的诊所表现无显著差异。在过去五年内进行过涂片检查的女性的中位数百分比在1985年和1988年分别为49%和69%(p < 0.001),无宫颈涂片记录的女性的中位数百分比分别为28%和16%(p < 0.001)。除六家诊所以外,所有诊所的这两项观察指标均有改善。在两次审核中,积极的召回系统与显著提高的表现相关(p < 0.05)。在九家诊所(16%)中,80%或更多的女性样本在过去五年内进行过涂片检查。
1985年至1988年期间,接受审核的诊所的组织与实施情况有所改善。虽然这可能是参与首次审核的结果,但这可能代表了初级保健领域更普遍的趋势。
在两次审核期间,更多诊所(87%对67%)制定了筛查政策,并且这更有可能包括对所有性活跃女性进行定期涂片检查的目标(98%对80%)。