Institute of Urology, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(12):1886-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09713.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
• To compare outcomes of hilar clamping and non-hilar clamping partial nephrectomy for tumours involving a solitary functional kidney.
• Between 1990 and 2009, 104 partial nephrectomies, excluding bench and autotransplant procedures, were performed on solitary functional kidneys. • An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed analyzing patient demographics, operative data, complications, oncological outcomes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). • GFR was calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. • Preoperative GFR was compared to Early GFR (lowest measured GFR 7-100 days postoperatively) and to Late GFR (GFR 101-365 days postoperatively). • Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess covariates affecting Late GFR. • Kaplan-Meier estimator was utilized to compare renal cell carcinoma (RCC) specific survival and non-RCC-related survival.
• In total, 29 partial nephrectomies with hilar clamping and 75 partial nephrectomies without hilar clamping were performed in solitary kidneys. Median follow-up was 57 months. • There was no difference in tumour size, location and the number of tumours resected between the two groups. Mean ischaemia time for the clamping group was 25 min. • Some 97% of the clamping procedures were performed with cold ischaemia. • There was no difference in intra-operative estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement or length of hospital stay. • The complication rate and spectrum of complications were similar between the two groups. • The two groups had similar preoperative GFR and Early GFR. The non-clamping group had a significantly smaller percent decrease in Late GFR (11.8% vs 27.7%, P= 0.01) than the clamping group. • The non-clamping group was significantly more likely to have a less than 10% decrease in Late GFR compared to the clamping group (60.9% vs 17.7%, P= 0.002). • On multivariate analysis, only hilar clamping was significantly associated with decreased Late GFR (estimate 15.0, P= 0.02). • Surgical margin positivity rate was higher in the clamping group (21% vs 4%, P= 0.01); however, the local recurrence rate between the two groups was similar. • The clamping and non-clamping groups had similar 5-year RCC-specific survival and 5-year non-RCC-related survival.
• Partial nephrectomy without hilar clamping in solitary kidneys provides similar cancer control compared to partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping. • Partial nephrectomy without clamping was associated with superior preservation of Late GFR. • No difference was detected in GFR early after surgery, possibly indicating that there may be ongoing renal loss after hilar clamping.
• 比较累及孤立功能性肾脏的肿瘤行肾门阻断与非肾门阻断部分肾切除术的结果。
• 1990 年至 2009 年间,对 104 例孤立功能性肾脏行部分肾切除术,不包括台上台下手术和自体移植手术。• 对患者的人口统计学数据、手术数据、并发症、肿瘤学结果和估计肾小球滤过率(GFR)进行机构审查委员会批准的回顾性分析。• 使用简化肾脏病饮食改良公式计算 GFR。• 比较术前 GFR 与早期 GFR(术后 7-100 天最低测量 GFR)和晚期 GFR(术后 101-365 天 GFR)。• 进行多元线性回归分析,以评估影响晚期 GFR 的协变量。• 采用 Kaplan-Meier 估计值比较肾细胞癌(RCC)特异性生存率和非 RCC 相关生存率。
• 总计在孤立肾脏中进行了 29 例肾门阻断部分肾切除术和 75 例非肾门阻断部分肾切除术。中位随访时间为 57 个月。• 两组肿瘤大小、位置和切除肿瘤数量无差异。夹闭组平均缺血时间为 25 分钟。• 约 97%的夹闭术采用低温缺血。• 术中估计失血量、输血需求或住院时间无差异。• 两组并发症发生率和并发症谱相似。• 两组术前 GFR 和早期 GFR 相似。非夹闭组晚期 GFR 下降幅度明显小于夹闭组(11.8%比 27.7%,P=0.01)。• 与夹闭组相比,非夹闭组更有可能出现晚期 GFR 下降小于 10%(60.9%比 17.7%,P=0.002)。• 多变量分析显示,只有肾门阻断与晚期 GFR 降低显著相关(估计值 15.0,P=0.02)。• 夹闭组的手术切缘阳性率较高(21%比 4%,P=0.01);然而,两组的局部复发率相似。• 夹闭组和非夹闭组的 5 年 RCC 特异性生存率和 5 年非 RCC 相关生存率相似。
• 孤立肾行非肾门阻断部分肾切除术与肾门阻断部分肾切除术相比,具有相似的肿瘤控制效果。• 非夹闭部分肾切除术与晚期 GFR 的较好保留相关。• 术后早期 GFR 无差异,可能表明肾门阻断后仍有持续的肾功能丧失。