Alenezi Ahmad, Motiwala Aamir, Eves Susannah, Gray Rob, Thomas Asha, Meiers Isabelle, Sharif Haytham, Motiwala Hanif, Laniado Marc, Karim Omer
Department of Urology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, Berkshire, SL2 4HL, UK.
HCA Laboratories, 43a Wimpole Street, London, W1G 8AQ, UK.
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1738. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
The paper describes novel real-time 'in situ mapping' and 'sequential occlusion angiography' to facilitate selective ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) using intraoperative contrast enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS).
Data were collected and assessed for 60 patients (61 tumours) between 2009 and 2013. 31 (50.8%) tumours underwent 'Global Ischaemia', 27 (44.3%) underwent 'Selective Ischaemia' and 3 (4.9%) were removed 'Off Clamp Zero Ischaemia'. Demographics, operative variables, complications, renal pathology and outcomes were assessed.
Median PADUA score was 9 (range 7-10). The mean warm ischaemia time in selective ischaemia was less and statistically significant than in global ischaemia (17.1 and 21.4, respectively). Mean operative time was 163 min. Postoperative complications (n = 10) included three (5%) Clavien grade 3 or above. Malignancy was demonstrated in 47 (77%) with negative margin in 43 (91.5%) and positive margin in four (8.5%). Long-term decrease in eGFR post selective ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy was less compared with global ischaemia (four and eight, respectively) but not statistically significant.
This technique is safe, feasible and cost-effective with comparable perioperative outcomes. The technical aspects elucidate the role of intraoperative CEUS to facilitate and ascertain selective ischaemia. Further work is required to demonstrate long-term oncological outcomes. © 2016 The Authors. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本文介绍了新颖的实时“原位映射”和“序贯闭塞血管造影”技术,以利用术中对比增强超声扫描(CEUS)辅助进行选择性缺血性机器人部分肾切除术(RPN)。
收集并评估了2009年至2013年间60例患者(61个肿瘤)的数据。31个(50.8%)肿瘤接受了“全肾缺血”,27个(44.3%)接受了“选择性缺血”,3个(4.9%)在“无阻断零缺血”状态下切除。评估了人口统计学、手术变量、并发症、肾脏病理及结果。
PADUA评分中位数为9(范围7 - 10)。选择性缺血组的平均热缺血时间比全肾缺血组短且具有统计学意义(分别为17.1和21.4)。平均手术时间为163分钟。术后并发症(n = 10)包括3例(5%)Clavien 3级及以上。47例(77%)证实为恶性肿瘤,其中43例(91.5%)切缘阴性,4例(8.5%)切缘阳性。与全肾缺血相比,选择性缺血性机器人部分肾切除术后eGFR的长期下降幅度较小(分别为4和8),但无统计学意义。
该技术安全、可行且具有成本效益,围手术期结果相当。技术方面阐明了术中CEUS在促进和确定选择性缺血中的作用。需要进一步开展工作以证明长期肿瘤学结果。© 2016作者。《国际医疗机器人与计算机辅助手术杂志》由约翰·威利父子有限公司出版