Center for Brain Health, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75390, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Jan;17(1):24-35. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710001189. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is a common mechanism of traumatic brain injury not readily identified using conventional neuroimaging modalities. Novel imaging modalities such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microstructural compromise in white matter (WM) in various clinical populations including TAI. DTI-derived data can be analyzed using global methods (i.e., WM histogram or voxel-based approaches) or a regional approach (i.e., tractography). While each of these methods produce qualitatively comparable results, it is not clear which is most useful in clinical research and ultimately in clinical practice. This study compared three methods of analyzing DTI-derived data with regard to detection of WM injury and their association with clinical outcomes. Thirty patients with TAI and 19 demographically similar normal controls were scanned using a 3 Tesla magnet. Patients were scanned approximately eight months postinjury, and underwent an outcomes assessment at that time. Histogram analysis of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity showed global WM integrity differences between patients and controls. Voxel-based and tractography analyses showed significant decreases in FA within centroaxial structures involved in TAI. All three techniques were associated with functional and cognitive outcomes. DTI measures of microstructural integrity appear robust, as the three analysis techniques studied showed adequate utility for detecting WM injury.
创伤性轴索损伤(TAI)是一种常见的创伤性脑损伤机制,常规神经影像学方法难以识别。新型成像方式,如弥散张量成像(DTI),可以在包括 TAI 在内的各种临床人群中检测到白质(WM)的微观结构损伤。DTI 衍生的数据可以使用全局方法(即 WM 直方图或体素基方法)或局部方法(即束追踪)进行分析。虽然这些方法都能产生定性上可比的结果,但在临床研究中,哪种方法最有用,最终在临床实践中哪种方法最有用,尚不清楚。本研究比较了三种分析 DTI 衍生数据的方法,以检测 WM 损伤及其与临床结局的相关性。30 名 TAI 患者和 19 名年龄、性别匹配的正常对照组在 3T 磁共振仪上进行扫描。患者在受伤后约 8 个月进行扫描,并在此时进行了结果评估。FA 和平均弥散度的直方图分析显示患者和对照组之间存在整体 WM 完整性差异。基于体素和束追踪分析显示,TAI 涉及的中轴结构的 FA 值显著降低。所有三种技术均与功能和认知结局相关。DTI 微观结构完整性的测量结果似乎很可靠,因为所研究的三种分析技术都显示出足够的检测 WM 损伤的能力。