Mayet Anna, Zablotski Yury, Roth Susanne Pauline, Brehm Walter, Troillet Antonia
Department for Horses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 23;10:1125695. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1125695. eCollection 2023.
Equine veterinarians face challenges in treating horses with osteoarthritic joint pain in routine veterinary practice. All common treatment options aim to reduce the clinical consequences of osteoarthritis (OA) characterized by persistent synovitis and progressive degradation of articular cartilage. A range of joint-associated cell types and extracellular matrices are involved in the not yet entirely understood chronic inflammatory process. Regeneration of articular tissues to re-establish joint hemostasis is the future perspective when fundamental healing of OA is the long-term goal. The use of intra-articular applied biologic therapeutics derived from blood or mesenchymal stroma cell (MSC) sources is nowadays a well-accepted treatment option. Although this group of therapeutics is not totally consistent due to the lack of clear definitions and compositions, they all share a potential regenerative effect on articular tissues as described in and studies. However, the current stage of science in regenerative medicine needs to be supported by clinical reports as in fact, studies as well as studies using induced OA models still represent a fragment of the complex pathomechanism of naturally occurring OA. This systemic review aims to determine the long-term effect of orthobiologic therapeutics in horses suffering naturally occurring OA. Thereby, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is conducted to describe the efficiency and safety of intra-articular applied orthobiologics in terms of lameness reduction in the long-term. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria for the systemic review. Four of those studies have further been evaluated by the meta-analysis comparing the long-term effect in lameness reduction. Each study was examined for risk of bias. For data evaluation, a random-effects model was used, describing the overall outcome in a forest plot. The I statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Results indicate, that orthobiologic therapies represent an effective long-term and safe OA treatment option. Due to the inhomogeneity of included studies, no statements are provided addressing specific orthobiologic therapies, affected joints, OA stage and horse's intended use. Future clinical trials should follow standardized study designs to provide comparable data.
在日常兽医实践中,马兽医在治疗患骨关节炎关节疼痛的马匹时面临挑战。所有常见的治疗选择都旨在减轻以持续性滑膜炎和关节软骨进行性退变为特征的骨关节炎(OA)的临床后果。一系列与关节相关的细胞类型和细胞外基质参与了尚未完全理解的慢性炎症过程。当OA的根本治愈是长期目标时,关节组织再生以重建关节止血是未来的发展方向。目前,使用源自血液或间充质基质细胞(MSC)来源的关节内应用生物治疗剂是一种广泛接受的治疗选择。尽管由于缺乏明确的定义和组成,这组治疗剂并不完全一致,但如[具体文献1]和[具体文献2]研究中所述,它们都对关节组织具有潜在的再生作用。然而,再生医学的当前科学阶段需要临床报告的支持,事实上,[具体文献3]研究以及使用诱导性OA模型的研究仍然只是自然发生的OA复杂病理机制的一部分。本系统评价旨在确定矫形生物治疗剂对自然发生OA的马匹的长期影响。因此,进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,以描述关节内应用矫形生物制剂在长期减轻跛行方面的有效性和安全性。根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,13项研究符合系统评价的纳入标准。其中4项研究通过荟萃分析进一步评估,比较了长期减轻跛行的效果。对每项研究进行偏倚风险检查。对于数据评估,使用随机效应模型,在森林图中描述总体结果。I统计量用于评估异质性。结果表明,矫形生物治疗是一种有效的长期且安全的OA治疗选择。由于纳入研究的异质性,未针对特定的矫形生物治疗、受影响的关节、OA阶段和马匹的预期用途发表声明。未来的临床试验应遵循标准化的研究设计,以提供可比的数据。