公众对使用全科医生记录中的个人健康信息进行研究的态度:对爱尔兰公众的调查。

Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2011 Jan;37(1):50-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037903. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the views of the public is essential if generally acceptable policies are to be devised that balance research access to general practice patient records with protection of patients' privacy. However, few large studies have been conducted about public attitudes to research access to personal health information.

METHODS

A mixed methods study was performed. Informed by focus groups and literature review, a questionnaire was designed which assessed attitudes to research access to personal health information and factors that influence these. A postal survey was conducted of an electoral roll-based sample of the adult population of Ireland.

RESULTS

Completed questionnaires were returned by 1575 (40.6%). Among the respondents, 67.5% were unwilling to allow GPs to decide when researchers could access identifiable personal health information. However, 89.5% said they would agree to ongoing consent arrangements, allowing the sharing by GPs of anonymous personal health information with researchers without the need for consent on a study-by-study basis. Increasing age (by each 10-year increment), being retired and primary level education only were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of agreeing that any personal health information could be shared on an ongoing basis: OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.63), 2.00 (95% CI 1.22 to 3.29) and 3.91 (95% CI 1.95 to 7.85), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survey data can be prone to response biases, this study suggests that prior consent agreements allowing the supply by GPs of anonymous personal health information to researchers may be widely supported, and that populations willing to opt in to such arrangements may be sufficiently representative to facilitate valid and robust consent-dependent observational research.

摘要

简介

如果要制定普遍可接受的政策,在平衡研究获取全科医生患者记录与保护患者隐私之间的关系,那么了解公众的观点至关重要。然而,关于公众对研究获取个人健康信息的态度的大型研究很少。

方法

本研究采用混合方法。通过焦点小组和文献回顾,设计了一份调查问卷,评估了公众对研究获取个人健康信息的态度以及影响这些态度的因素。对爱尔兰成年人口的选举名册进行了基于邮寄的问卷调查。

结果

共收回 1575 份(40.6%)有效问卷。在受访者中,67.5%的人不愿意让全科医生决定何时可以访问可识别的个人健康信息。然而,89.5%的人表示他们将同意持续同意安排,允许全科医生与研究人员共享匿名个人健康信息,而无需在每项研究的基础上同意。年龄每增加 10 岁(每 10 岁递增)、退休和仅接受过小学教育与更有可能同意持续共享任何个人健康信息呈正相关:OR 分别为 1.39(95%CI 1.18 至 1.63)、2.00(95%CI 1.22 至 3.29)和 3.91(95%CI 1.95 至 7.85)。

结论

尽管调查数据可能容易受到响应偏差的影响,但本研究表明,允许全科医生向研究人员提供匿名个人健康信息的事先同意协议可能会得到广泛支持,并且愿意选择参与此类安排的人群可能具有足够的代表性,以促进有效的、稳健的基于同意的观察性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索