J Clin Pathol. 1990 Jan;43(1):73-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.1.73.
Various tests have been advocated for the detection of lupus like anticoagulants (LA) and related antiphospholipid antibodies, but there is no agreement on the most appropriate laboratory approach. Two hundred and fifty five of 433 hospital centres in the United Kingdom responded to a questionnaire. Many different tests were reported to be in use for screening for LA with considerable variation in plasma preparation, choice of reagent, and methodological details. Three freeze dried plasmas were subsequently assessed for the presence of LA by 183 laboratories. While 92% correctly identified a strong inhibitor and 91% a negative control, only 65% correctly identified a weak inhibitor. Pronounced variations in the suitability of commonly used reagents in the activated partial thromboplastin time test (APTT) were noted and important methodological features were identified in the kaolin clotting time, dilute thromboplastin time, and dilute Russell's viper venom time tests. It is concluded that careful plasma preparation, with avoidance of platelet contamination, use of a suitable test in addition to the APTT, and attention to methodological detail are essential for the reliable identification of LA, a clinically important inhibitor.
人们提倡使用各种检测方法来检测狼疮抗凝物(LA)及相关抗磷脂抗体,但对于最合适的实验室检测方法尚无定论。英国433家医院中心中有255家回复了一份调查问卷。据报告,许多不同的检测方法都用于LA筛查,在血浆制备、试剂选择和方法学细节方面存在很大差异。随后,183家实验室对三种冻干血浆进行了LA检测。虽然92%的实验室正确识别出强抑制剂,91%的实验室正确识别出阴性对照,但只有65%的实验室正确识别出弱抑制剂。研究发现,活化部分凝血活酶时间试验(APTT)中常用试剂的适用性存在显著差异,并且在高岭土凝血时间、稀释凝血活酶时间和稀释蝰蛇毒时间试验中确定了重要的方法学特征。结论是,谨慎进行血浆制备,避免血小板污染,除APTT外使用合适的检测方法,并注意方法学细节,对于可靠识别LA(一种临床上重要的抑制剂)至关重要。