University of Tennessee, Department of Comparative Medicine, Knoxville, TN 37996-4543, USA
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;20(12):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.06.013.
Stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) require timely geographic accessibility to emergency care. Historically, studies used straight line distances as measures of geographic accessibility. Recently, travel time has been recognized as a better indicator of accessibility because travel impedances can be considered. This study used finer grained transportation data and network analysis to investigate neighborhood disparities in travel time to emergency stroke and MI care.
Travel times to stroke and cardiac centers were computed using network analysis, while considering distance, speed limit, road connectivity, and turn impedances. Neighborhoods within 30, 60, or 90 minutes travel were identified. Travel time by air ambulance was calculated and adjusted for flying speed and some delays.
Approximately 8% and 15% of the study population did not have timely geographic accessibility to emergency stroke and MI care, respectively. Populations with poor access were located in rural areas. The entire study population had timely access by air ambulance.
This study identified disparities in geographic accessibility to emergency stroke and MI care in East Tennessee. Use of air ambulance or telemedicine could play a vital role in addressing these disparities. This information is important for evidence-based health planning and resource allocation.
中风和心肌梗死 (MI) 需要及时获得紧急护理的地理可达性。历史上,研究使用直线距离作为地理可达性的衡量标准。最近,人们认识到旅行时间是更好的可达性指标,因为可以考虑旅行障碍。本研究使用更精细的交通数据和网络分析来调查中风和心脏中心急救护理的邻里差异。
使用网络分析计算中风和心脏中心的旅行时间,同时考虑距离、限速、道路连通性和转弯障碍。确定 30、60 或 90 分钟内的出行区域。计算并调整了空中救护车的飞行速度和一些延误的飞行时间。
分别约有 8%和 15%的研究人群无法及时获得中风和 MI 急救护理的地理可达性。可达性差的人群位于农村地区。整个研究人群都可以通过空中救护车及时获得医疗服务。
本研究确定了东田纳西州急救中风和 MI 护理的地理可达性方面的差异。使用空中救护车或远程医疗可能在解决这些差异方面发挥重要作用。这些信息对于循证卫生规划和资源分配很重要。