• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊癌:在三个国家的中心接受治疗的患者在表现、手术治疗和生存方面的差异。

Gallbladder cancer: differences in presentation, surgical treatment, and survival in patients treated at centers in three countries.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jan;212(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.009. Epub 2010 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.009
PMID:21075015
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer (GBCA) is a rare malignancy with a variable incidence worldwide. This study analyzed GBCA patients treated at centers in 3 countries. The aim was to assess for location-specific differences in presentation and outcomes, which might suggest differences in pathogenesis or disease biology.

STUDY DESIGN

Data for consecutive patients submitted to operation at Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez (FALP, Chile), Yokohama City University (YCU, Japan), and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC, USA) between 1999 and 2007 were studied retrospectively. Patient demographics, disease- and treatment-related variables and outcomes were analyzed by chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-one patients (MSKCC, 130; FALP, 85; YCU, 46) underwent exploration, and 160 (MSKCC, 91; FALP, 33; YCU, 36) underwent R0 resection. Patients treated at FALP were younger (median 57 years, p < 0.001) and more often female (80%, p < 0.005); at YCU there were fewer patients with incidental tumors (19.5% compared with more than 60% at FALP and MSKCC, p < 0.001). En bloc liver and bile duct resections were performed more commonly at MSKCC and YCU (p < 0.001). Patients treated at FALP had more advanced tumor stage compared with those treated at MSKCC and YCU (p < 0.001). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was not different among the groups when patients submitted to an R0 resection were analyzed (p = 0.12). On multivariate analysis, T-stage, nodal involvement, and bile duct involvement were predictors of DSS; center was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some differences in presentation, disease extent, and surgical treatment, DSS after curative intent resection was similar among all 3 groups. The most important predictors of outcomes were related to tumor extent rather than country of origin.

摘要

背景

胆囊癌(GBCA)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,其发病率在全球范围内存在差异。本研究分析了在 3 个国家的中心治疗的 GBCA 患者。目的是评估特定部位的表现和结果差异,这可能表明发病机制或疾病生物学的差异。

研究设计

回顾性分析了 1999 年至 2007 年间在 Fundación Arturo López Pérez 肿瘤研究所(FALP,智利)、横滨市立大学(YCU,日本)和 Memorial Sloan-Kettering 癌症中心(MSKCC,美国)接受手术的连续患者的数据。通过卡方检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和对数秩检验分析患者的人口统计学、疾病和治疗相关变量及结果。

结果

261 例患者(MSKCC 130 例,FALP 85 例,YCU 46 例)接受了探查,160 例(MSKCC 91 例,FALP 33 例,YCU 36 例)接受了 R0 切除。FALP 治疗的患者年龄较小(中位年龄 57 岁,p < 0.001),女性比例较高(80%,p < 0.005);YCU 中偶然发现肿瘤的患者较少(19.5%,而 FALP 和 MSKCC 中超过 60%,p < 0.001)。MSKCC 和 YCU 更常进行整块肝和胆管切除术(p < 0.001)。与 MSKCC 和 YCU 相比,FALP 治疗的患者肿瘤分期更晚(p < 0.001)。当分析接受 R0 切除的患者时,各组之间的疾病特异性生存率(DSS)无差异(p = 0.12)。多因素分析显示,T 分期、淋巴结受累和胆管受累是 DSS 的预测因素;中心无显著性差异。

结论

尽管在表现、疾病程度和手术治疗方面存在一些差异,但根治性切除术后的 DSS 在所有 3 组中相似。影响预后的最重要因素与肿瘤程度有关,而与起源国无关。

相似文献

1
Gallbladder cancer: differences in presentation, surgical treatment, and survival in patients treated at centers in three countries.胆囊癌:在三个国家的中心接受治疗的患者在表现、手术治疗和生存方面的差异。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jan;212(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.009. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
2
Combined pancreaticoduodenectomy and hepatectomy for patients with locally advanced gallbladder carcinoma: long term results.联合胰十二指肠切除术和肝切除术治疗局部晚期胆囊癌患者:长期结果
Cancer. 1997 Nov 15;80(10):1904-9.
3
Accurate staging for gallbladder cancer: implications for surgical therapy and pathological assessment.准确的胆囊癌分期:对手术治疗和病理评估的影响。
Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):320-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822238d8.
4
Retrospective analysis of outcome in 63 gallbladder carcinoma patients after radical resection.63例胆囊癌患者根治性切除术后结局的回顾性分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13(6):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1104-6. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
5
Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy with wide lymph node dissection for locally advanced carcinoma of the gallbladder--long-term results.扩大淋巴结清扫的肝胰十二指肠切除术治疗局部进展期胆囊癌——长期结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):912-5.
6
Analysis of the extent of resection for adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder.胆囊腺癌切除范围分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr;16(4):806-16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0189-3. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
7
Indications for curative resection of advanced gallbladder cancer with hepatoduodenal ligament invasion.伴有肝十二指肠韧带侵犯的进展期胆囊癌根治性切除的指征。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8(6):505-10. doi: 10.1007/s005340100017.
8
Carcinoma of the gallbladder: an appraisal of surgical resection.胆囊癌:手术切除评估
Surgery. 1994 Jun;115(6):751-6.
9
[Prognostic factors in gallbladder carcinoma as a decision aid for reoperation].[胆囊癌的预后因素作为再次手术的决策辅助依据]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1072-4.
10
Gallbladder cancer: Defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection.胆囊癌:明确原发性根治性切除术和根治性再次切除术的适应证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):833-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9097-6. Epub 2006 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Enumeration, classification and clinical application of circulating tumor cells in advanced gallbladder adenocarcinoma.晚期胆囊腺癌中循环肿瘤细胞的计数、分类及临床应用
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14140-w.
2
Laparoscopic Reoperation for Postoperatively Diagnosed Gallbladder Cancer: Technical Options for Cystic Duct Management.腹腔镜再次手术治疗术后诊断的胆囊癌:胆囊管处理的技术选择
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1817-1818. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16552-7. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
3
Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Carcinoma: Can F-18 FDG PET/CT Aid in Staging and Prognostication?
偶然发现的胆囊癌:F-18 FDG PET/CT能否辅助分期及预后评估?
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 May;58(3):104-112. doi: 10.1007/s13139-024-00841-w. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Acylcarnitines promote gallbladder cancer metastasis through lncBCL2L11-THOC5-JNK axis.酰基辅酶 A 通过 lncBCL2L11-THOC5-JNK 轴促进胆囊癌转移。
J Transl Med. 2024 Mar 22;22(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05091-0.
5
The prognostic value of combined preoperative PLR and CA19-9 in patients with resectable gallbladder cancer.术前联合 PLR 和 CA19-9 对可切除胆囊癌患者的预后价值。
Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1235-1245. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01774-x. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
6
Prognostic value of combined preoperative inflammatory marker neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet distribution width in patients with gallbladder carcinoma.术前炎症标志物中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值与血小板分布宽度联合对胆囊癌患者的预后价值。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 2;409(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03247-6.
7
Circulating Tumor Cells are an Independent Risk Factor for Poor Prognosis in Patients with Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma.循环肿瘤细胞是胆囊腺癌患者预后不良的独立危险因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):7966-7975. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14231-7. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
Reappraisal of T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC): clinicopathologic analysis of 473 in situ and invasive GBCs and critical review of the literature highlights its rarity, and that it has a very good prognosis.T1b 期胆囊癌(GBC)再评估:473 例原位和浸润性 GBC 的临床病理分析,并对文献进行批判性回顾,强调其罕见性和极佳的预后。
Virchows Arch. 2023 Feb;482(2):311-323. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03482-6. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Non-coding RNAs as potential biomarkers of gallbladder cancer.非编码 RNA 作为胆囊癌的潜在生物标志物。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2023 Jun;25(6):1489-1511. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-03056-7. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
10
Preoperative Assessment and Perioperative Management of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine and Novel Technologies: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.精准医学与新技术时代可切除胆囊癌的术前评估与围手术期管理:现状与未来展望
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;12(7):1630. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071630.