D'Angelica Michael, Dalal Kimberly Moore, DeMatteo Ronald P, Fong Yuman, Blumgart Leslie H, Jarnagin William R
Hepatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr;16(4):806-16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0189-3. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
Gallbladder cancer has historically been considered an incurable malignancy; although, extended resection has been associated with cure in selected patients. However, the optimal extent of resection is unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the extent of resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma on disease-specific survival (DSS) and perioperative morbidity. Analysis of a prospective hepatobiliary surgery database identified patients undergoing surgical resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma from 1990 to 2002. Clinicopathologic factors including extent of resection were analyzed for their association with DSS and perioperative morbidity. Long-term outcome was evaluable in 104 patients. With median follow-up of 58 months for survivors, the actuarial 5-year DSS was 42%. Thirty-six patients (35%) underwent major hepatectomy, but in 15 this was not mandatory to clear all disease. Sixty-eight patients (65%) underwent common bile duct (CBD) excision, but 32 were performed empirically. Twenty-one patients (20%) underwent en bloc resection of adjacent organs other than the liver. The performance of a major hepatectomy or a CBD excision was not associated with other clinicopathologic variables or long-term survival. Resection of adjacent organs were associated with advanced T stage but not with survival. T stage, N stage, histologic differentiation, and CBD involvement were independently associated with survival. Major hepatectomy and CBD excision were significantly associated with perioperative morbidity. We conclude that tumor biology and stage, rather than extent of resection, predict outcome after resection for gallbladder cancer. Major hepatic resections, including major hepatectomy and CBD excision, are appropriate when necessary to clear disease but are not mandatory in all cases.
胆囊癌在历史上一直被认为是一种无法治愈的恶性肿瘤;尽管扩大切除术已使部分特定患者获得治愈。然而,最佳的切除范围尚不清楚。本研究的目的是分析胆囊腺癌切除范围对疾病特异性生存(DSS)和围手术期发病率的影响。对一个前瞻性肝胆外科数据库进行分析,确定了1990年至2002年期间接受胆囊腺癌手术切除的患者。分析包括切除范围在内的临床病理因素与DSS和围手术期发病率的相关性。104例患者的长期预后可评估。幸存者的中位随访时间为58个月,5年精算DSS为42%。36例患者(35%)接受了扩大肝切除术,但其中15例并非为清除所有病灶而必须进行。68例患者(65%)接受了胆总管(CBD)切除术,但其中32例是经验性实施的。21例患者(20%)接受了肝脏以外相邻器官的整块切除。扩大肝切除术或CBD切除术的实施与其他临床病理变量或长期生存无关。相邻器官的切除与T分期进展相关,但与生存无关。T分期、N分期、组织学分化和CBD受累与生存独立相关。扩大肝切除术和CBD切除术与围手术期发病率显著相关。我们得出结论,对于胆囊癌,肿瘤生物学和分期而非切除范围可预测切除后的预后。必要时,包括扩大肝切除术和CBD切除术在内的大型肝切除术对于清除病灶是合适的,但并非在所有情况下都是必需的。