Suppr超能文献

老年人疼痛评估表的可重复性和可靠性。

Replicability and reliability of pain assessment forms in geriatrics.

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Koca Mustafa Pasa Street, Fatih, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Jul-Aug;53(1):e55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Nov 13.

Abstract

Aim of the study was to investigate the replicability and reliability of the multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and visual analog scale (VAS) in young and elderly individuals with chronic pain. Ambulatory patients, 20 of them aged above 65 years and complaining about chronic pain and 20 patients with the age of 40 and younger working in a factory were assessed with VAS and MDHAQ. The assessment was repeated to investigate the replicability and reliability of both tests. According to MDHAQ disability index (DI), the elderly had more complains on the first and second day of the study (p<0.001). In terms of changes between first and second days, DI scores of the elderly group (r=0.634; p=0.003) and the younger group (r=0.888; p<0.001) had quite similar responses. Criteria for the assessment of pain, fatigue and general condition according to MDHAQ were similar in both groups in terms of changes between first and second day of the study, there was no significant differences between the groups. But while responses in the younger group according to these 3 parameters were highly reliable, the elderly group's responses were reliable only for their last week pain assessment. Both tests were replicable in the elderly group, VAS and MDHAQ were especially applicable for the last time phase of their pain; while fatigue, general health condition and DI indicated diminished reliability in the elderly group, compared to the young group.

摘要

研究目的在于探究多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)在慢性疼痛的年轻和老年患者中的可重复性和可靠性。对 20 名年龄在 65 岁以上、抱怨慢性疼痛的门诊患者和 20 名年龄在 40 岁以下、在工厂工作的患者进行 VAS 和 MDHAQ 评估。评估结果进行重复,以探究两种测试的可重复性和可靠性。根据 MDHAQ 残疾指数(DI),老年人在研究的第一天和第二天有更多的抱怨(p<0.001)。在第一天和第二天之间的变化方面,老年组(r=0.634;p=0.003)和年轻组(r=0.888;p<0.001)的 DI 评分有非常相似的反应。根据 MDHAQ 评估疼痛、疲劳和一般状况的标准,在研究的第一天和第二天之间,两组之间的变化相似,两组之间没有显著差异。然而,尽管年轻组根据这 3 个参数的反应具有高度可靠性,但老年组的反应仅在其最后一周的疼痛评估中可靠。两种测试在老年组中均具有可重复性,VAS 和 MDHAQ 尤其适用于疼痛的最后阶段;而疲劳、一般健康状况和 DI 表明老年组的可靠性低于年轻组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验