Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.035. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
To assess intrafractional geometric accuracy of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) patients treated with volumetric image guidance.
Treatment setup accuracy was analyzed in 133 SBRT patients treated via research ethics board-approved protocols. For each fraction, a localization cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was acquired for soft-tissue registration to the internal target volume, followed by a couch adjustment for positional discrepancies greater than 3 mm, verified with a second CBCT scan. CBCT scans were also performed at intrafraction and end fraction. Patient positioning data from 2047 CBCT scans were recorded to determine systematic (Σ) and random (σ) uncertainties, as well as planning target volume margins. Data were further stratified and analyzed by immobilization method (evacuated cushion [n=75], evacuated cushion plus abdominal compression [n=33], or chest board [n=25]) and by patients' Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS): 0 (n=31), 1 (n=70), or 2 (n=32).
Using CBCT internal target volume was matched within ±3 mm in 16% of all fractions at localization, 89% at verification, 72% during treatment, and 69% after treatment. Planning target volume margins required to encompass residual setup errors after couch corrections (verification CBCT scans) were 4 mm, and they increased to 5 mm with target intrafraction motion (post-treatment CBCT scans). Small differences (<1 mm) in the cranial-caudal direction of target position were observed between the immobilization cohorts in the localization, verification, intrafraction, and post-treatment CBCT scans (p<0.01). Positional drift varied according to patient PS, with the PS 1 and 2 cohorts drifting out of position by mid treatment more than the PS 0 cohort in the cranial-caudal direction (p=0.04).
Image guidance ensures high geometric accuracy for lung SBRT irrespective of immobilization method or PS. A 5-mm setup margin suffices to address intrafraction motion. This setup margin may be further reduced by strategies such as frequent image guidance or volumetric arc therapy to correct or limit intrafraction motion.
评估接受容积图像引导的肺部立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)患者的分次内几何精度。
通过经伦理委员会批准的方案,对 133 例 SBRT 患者的治疗进行了治疗设置精度分析。对于每个分次,先进行软组织配准的定位锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描,以内部靶区为目标,然后对大于 3 毫米的位置差异进行床调整,并通过第二次 CBCT 扫描验证。在分次内和分次末也进行 CBCT 扫描。记录 2047 次 CBCT 扫描的患者定位数据,以确定系统(Σ)和随机(σ)不确定性,以及计划靶区边界。数据还根据固定方法(排空垫[75 例]、排空垫加腹部压缩[33 例]或胸部板[25 例])和患者的东部肿瘤协作组表现状态(PS)进行分层和分析:0(31 例)、1(70 例)或 2(32 例)。
使用 CBCT 内部靶区在定位时 16%的所有分次中匹配在±3 毫米内,在验证时 89%,在治疗期间 72%,在治疗后 69%。为了在床调整后包含残余设置误差(验证 CBCT 扫描),需要 4 毫米的计划靶区边界,而在目标分次内运动时(治疗后 CBCT 扫描)则增加到 5 毫米。在定位、验证、分次内和治疗后 CBCT 扫描中,在固定组之间观察到目标位置的头脚方向差异较小(<1 毫米)(p<0.01)。根据患者 PS,位置漂移情况不同,PS 1 和 2 组在头脚方向上比 PS 0 组更偏离位置(p=0.04)。
图像引导确保了肺部 SBRT 的高几何精度,与固定方法或 PS 无关。5 毫米的设置边界足以解决分次内运动问题。通过频繁的图像引导或容积弧形治疗等策略,可以进一步减小这种设置边界,以纠正或限制分次内运动。