• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心欧洲 PARTNER 经导管心脏瓣膜研究的一年随访结果。

One year follow-up of the multi-centre European PARTNER transcatheter heart valve study.

机构信息

Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier, 6 avenue du Noyer Lambert, Massy, France.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(2):148-57. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq427. Epub 2010 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq427
PMID:21075775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3021390/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a new therapeutic option in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

AIMS

PARTNER EU is the first study to evaluate prospectively the procedural and mid-term outcomes of transfemoral (TF) or transapical (TA) implantation of the Edwards SAPIEN® valve involving a multi-disciplinary approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Primary safety endpoints were 30 days and 6 months mortality. Primary efficacy endpoints were haemodynamic and functional improvement at 12 months. One hundred and thirty patients (61 TF, 69 TA), aged 82.1 ± 5.5 years were included. TA patients had higher logistic EuroSCORE (33.8 vs. 25.7%, P = 0.0005) and more peripheral disease (49.3 vs. 16.4%, P< 0.0001). Procedures were aborted in four TA (5.8%) and six TF cases (9.8%). Valve implantation was successful in the remaining patients in 95.4 and 96.4%, respectively. Thirty days and 6 months survival were 81.2 and 58.0% (TA) and 91.8 and 90.2% (TF). In both groups, mean aortic gradient decreased from 46.9 ± 18.1 to 10.9 ± 5.4 mmHg 6 months post-TAVI. In total, 78.1 and 84.8% of patients experienced significant improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, whereas 73.9 and 72.7% had improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores in TA and TF cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This first team-based multi-centre European TAVI registry shows promising results in high-risk patients treated by TF or TA delivery. Survival rates differ significantly between TF and TA groups and probably reflect the higher risk profile of the TA cohort. Optimal patient screening, approach selection, and device refinement may improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的一种新的治疗选择。

目的

PARTNER EU 是第一项前瞻性评估经股(TF)或经心尖(TA)植入 Edwards SAPIEN®瓣膜的多学科方法的程序和中期结果的研究。

方法和结果

主要安全性终点为 30 天和 6 个月死亡率。主要疗效终点为 12 个月时血液动力学和功能改善。共纳入 130 例患者(61 例 TF,69 例 TA),年龄 82.1±5.5 岁。TA 患者的 logistic EuroSCORE 更高(33.8%比 25.7%,P=0.0005),外周血管疾病更多(49.3%比 16.4%,P<0.0001)。4 例 TA(5.8%)和 6 例 TF 病例(9.8%)的手术被取消。其余患者的瓣膜植入均成功,成功率分别为 95.4%和 96.4%。30 天和 6 个月的存活率分别为 TA 组的 81.2%和 58.0%和 TF 组的 91.8%和 90.2%。在两组中,主动脉瓣平均梯度从 TAVI 后 6 个月的 46.9±18.1mmHg 降至 10.9±5.4mmHg。共有 78.1%和 84.8%的患者纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级显著改善,TA 和 TF 队列分别有 73.9%和 72.7%的患者堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)评分改善。

结论

这是第一项基于团队的多中心欧洲 TAVI 登记研究,结果显示高危患者经 TF 或 TA 输送治疗有良好的效果。TF 和 TA 组之间的生存率有显著差异,这可能反映了 TA 组的风险较高。优化患者筛选、方法选择和器械改进可能会改善结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/3021390/f21d51576737/ehq42703.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/3021390/f3a829544653/ehq42701.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/3021390/b7092fb6c0d0/ehq42702.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/3021390/f21d51576737/ehq42703.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/3021390/f3a829544653/ehq42701.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/3021390/b7092fb6c0d0/ehq42702.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/3021390/f21d51576737/ehq42703.jpg

相似文献

1
One year follow-up of the multi-centre European PARTNER transcatheter heart valve study.多中心欧洲 PARTNER 经导管心脏瓣膜研究的一年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(2):148-57. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq427. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
2
Transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: a multicenter collaborative study.经心尖与经股主动脉瓣置换术:一项多中心合作研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.088. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis using the Edwards Sapien balloon-expandable bioprosthesis: a single centre study with immediate and medium-term outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者使用 Edwards Sapien 球囊扩张生物瓣:单中心即时和中期结果研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar 1;75(4):475-85. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22291.
4
Midterm outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的中期结果。
Innovations (Phila). 2014 Sep-Oct;9(5):343-7; discussion 348. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000097.
5
Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery.经心尖主动脉瓣植入术治疗既往心脏手术患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.077. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
Initial experience with the balloon expandable Edwards-SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve in Australia and New Zealand: the SOURCE ANZ registry: outcomes at 30 days and one year.澳大利亚和新西兰经皮球囊扩张式 Edwards-SAPIEN 经导管心脏瓣膜的初步经验:SOURCE ANZ 注册研究:30 天和 1 年的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;170(3):406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.027. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
7
Bleeding complications after surgical aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER I Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve).经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后出血并发症比较:来自 PARTNER I 试验(经导管主动脉瓣置入术)的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 25;63(11):1100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.058. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
8
Direct Comparison of Feasibility and Safety of Transfemoral Versus Transaortic Versus Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉入路与经主动脉入路和经心尖入路经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可行性和安全性的直接比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 28;9(22):2320-2325. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.009.
9
One-year outcomes of cohort 1 in the Edwards SAPIEN Aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) registry: the European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve.Edwards SAPIEN 主动脉生物瓣欧洲结局(SOURCE)注册研究队列 1 的 1 年结果:使用 Edwards SAPIEN 瓣膜的经导管主动脉瓣植入术的欧洲注册研究。
Circulation. 2011 Jul 26;124(4):425-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.001545. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
10
Medium term outcomes of transapical aortic valve implantation: results from the Italian Registry of Trans-Apical Aortic Valve Implantation.经心尖主动脉瓣植入术的中期结果:来自意大利经心尖主动脉瓣植入术登记处的数据。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):830-5; discussion 836. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.094. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain Improvement Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左心室整体纵向应变改善情况的评估
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2025 Apr-Jun;35(2):129-135. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_99_24. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Hemodynamic Factors Driving Peripheral Chemoreceptor Hypersensitivity: Is Severe Aortic Stenosis Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation a Valuable Human Model?驱动外周化学感受器超敏反应的血流动力学因素:经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗的严重主动脉瓣狭窄是一种有价值的人体模型吗?
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 3;13(3):611. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030611.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: A European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve.SAPIEN 主动脉生物瓣欧洲结果(SOURCE)注册研究的 30 天结果:采用 Edwards SAPIEN 瓣膜行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的欧洲注册研究。
Circulation. 2010 Jul 6;122(1):62-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.907402. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
2
Trans-apical aortic valve implantation: univariate and multivariate analyses of the early results from the SOURCE registry.经心尖主动脉瓣植入术:SOURCE 注册研究的早期结果的单变量和多变量分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Aug;38(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.048. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
3
Coronary Artery Disease and Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的冠状动脉疾病与血运重建
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 22;23(9):290. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309290. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Personalised preinterventional risk stratification of mortality, length of stay and hospitalisation costs in transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a machine learning algorithm: a pilot trial.使用机器学习算法对经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的死亡率、住院时间和住院费用进行个体化术前风险分层:一项试点研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Feb 22;11(1):e002540. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002540.
5
Fluoroscopy Time as a New Predictor of Short-Term Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.透视时间作为经导管主动脉瓣置换术后短期预后的新预测指标
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Nov 13;10(11):459. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10110459.
6
Personalised Treatment in Aortic Stenosis: A Patient-Tailored Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Approach.主动脉瓣狭窄的个性化治疗:一种针对患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入方法。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Nov 21;9(11):407. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9110407.
7
Immediate reduction in left ventricular ejection time following TAVI is associated with improved quality of life.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后左心室射血时间立即缩短与生活质量改善相关。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 16;9:988840. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.988840. eCollection 2022.
8
Impact of machine-learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve on decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.基于机器学习的冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影衍生的血流储备分数对行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者决策的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):6008-6016. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08758-8. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
A Novel Method to Predict Mortality and Length of Stay after Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术后死亡率和住院时间的预测新方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 6;57(12):1332. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121332.
10
Comparison of transcarotid versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis and contraindications for transfemoral access.比较经颈动脉与经心尖入路经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄且股动脉入路禁忌患者的结局。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(2):188-195. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0071. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗超高危或手术禁忌的重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者:多中心加拿大经验的急性和晚期结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 16;55(11):1080-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.014. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
4
Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results of three device generations of the CoreValve Revalving system.经皮主动脉瓣置换术的进展和现状:CoreValve Revalving 系统三代器械的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec;1(3):167-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.819839.
5
Images in cardiovascular medicine. Thrombotic restenosis after minimally invasive implantation of aortic valve stent.心血管医学影像。主动脉瓣支架微创植入术后血栓形成性再狭窄。
Circulation. 2009 Jul 28;120(4):e23-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.864892.
6
Results of transfemoral or transapical aortic valve implantation following a uniform assessment in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis.对高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行统一评估后经股动脉或经心尖主动脉瓣植入术的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):303-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.032.
7
The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is not appropriate for withholding surgery in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)不适用于对高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者实施手术限制:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jul 14;4:32. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-4-32.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on clinical and valve-related outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣植入术:对临床及瓣膜相关结局的影响。
Circulation. 2009 Jun 16;119(23):3009-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.837807. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
9
Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: utility of risk stratification with EuroSCORE.老年患者的主动脉瓣置换术:欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)风险分层的效用
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1440-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.057.
10
Early conduction disorders following percutaneous aortic valve replacement.经皮主动脉瓣置换术后早期传导障碍
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S126-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02298.x.