• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医生服务整合:一项创新计划的评估。

Integrating Physician Services in the Home: evaluation of an innovative program.

机构信息

University of Western Ontario, Family Medicine, Suite 245, 100 Collip Circle, London, ON N6G 4X8.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2010 Nov;56(11):1166-74.

PMID:21076000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2980438/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new program, Integrating Physician Services in the Home (IPSITH), to integrate family practice and home care for acutely ill patients.

DESIGN

Causal model, mixed-method, multi-measures design including comparison of IPSITH and non-IPSITH patients. Data were collected through chart reviews and through surveys of IPSITH and non-IPSITH patients, caregivers, family physicians, and community nurses.

SETTING

London, Ont, and surrounding communities, where home care is coordinated through the Community Care Access Centre.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 82 patients receiving the new IPSITH program of care (including 29 family physicians and 1 nurse practitioner), 82 non-randomized matched patients receiving usual care (and their physicians), community nurses, and caregivers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Emergency department (ED) visits and satisfaction with care. Analysis included a process evaluation of the IPSITH program and an outcomes evaluation comparing IPSITH and non-IPSITH patients.

RESULTS

Patients and family physicians were very satisfied with the addition of a nurse practitioner to the IPSITH team. Controlling for symptom severity, a significantly smaller proportion of IPSITH patients had ED visits (3.7% versus 20.7%; P = .002), and IPSITH patients and their caregivers, family physicians, and community nurses had significantly higher levels of satisfaction (P < .05). There was no difference in caregiver burden between groups.

CONCLUSION

Family physicians can be integrated into acute home care when appropriately supported by a team including a nurse practitioner. This integrated team was associated with better patient and system outcomes. The gains for the health system are reduced strain on hospital EDs and more satisfied patients.

摘要

目的

评估一项新的项目,即家庭医生综合服务计划(IPSITH),以整合家庭医生和家庭护理,为急性病患者提供服务。

设计

因果模型、混合方法、多措施设计,包括 IPSITH 患者和非 IPSITH 患者的比较。数据通过病历回顾和 IPSITH 患者和非 IPSITH 患者、护理人员、家庭医生和社区护士的调查收集。

地点

安大略省伦敦及周边社区,家庭护理通过社区护理准入中心协调。

参与者

共 82 名接受新 IPSITH 护理计划的患者(包括 29 名家庭医生和 1 名护士从业者)、82 名接受常规护理的非随机匹配患者(及其医生)、社区护士和护理人员。

主要观察指标

急诊部(ED)就诊次数和护理满意度。分析包括 IPSITH 项目的过程评估和 IPSITH 患者与非 IPSITH 患者的结果评估。

结果

患者和家庭医生对在 IPSITH 团队中增加护士从业者非常满意。在控制症状严重程度的情况下,IPSITH 患者 ED 就诊的比例显著较小(3.7%对 20.7%;P=.002),IPSITH 患者及其护理人员、家庭医生和社区护士的满意度显著更高(P<.05)。两组间护理人员负担无差异。

结论

当家庭医生得到包括护士从业者在内的团队适当支持时,可以整合到急性家庭护理中。这种整合的团队与更好的患者和系统结果相关。对卫生系统的好处是减少医院急诊部的压力和提高患者满意度。

相似文献

1
Integrating Physician Services in the Home: evaluation of an innovative program.家庭医生服务整合:一项创新计划的评估。
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Nov;56(11):1166-74.
2
Work in progress. Integrating physicians' services in the home.进行中。整合家庭医生服务。
Can Fam Physician. 2001 Dec;47:2502-9.
3
Evolving the delivery of acute care services in the home.
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2003;22(1):55-74. doi: 10.1300/J027v22n01_04.
4
Patient, informal caregiver and care provider acceptance of a hospital in the home program in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省患者、非正式护理人员及护理提供者对家庭医院项目的接受度
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug 17;7:130. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-130.
5
A comparative study of nursing home resident outcomes between care provided by nurse practitioners/physicians versus physicians only.执业护士/医生与仅由医生提供护理的养老院居民护理效果的比较研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;5(1):16-23.
6
Care process and satisfaction analysis of a transmural home care program.经壁家庭护理项目的护理过程与满意度分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 1998 Jun;35(3):146-54. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00022-4.
7
Physician, nurse, and social worker collaboration in primary care for chronically ill seniors.医生、护士和社会工作者在慢性病老年人初级保健中的协作。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1825-33. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.12.1825.
8
Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial.执业护士或医生治疗患者的初级保健结果:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2000 Jan 5;283(1):59-68. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.1.59.
9
Community physicians' cooperation with a program of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment.社区医生与一项居家综合老年评估项目的合作。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Sep;43(9):1016-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb05566.x.
10
What is the role of the general practitioner towards the family caregiver of a community-dwelling demented relative? A systematic literature review.全科医生对社区痴呆患者家庭照顾者的作用是什么?一项系统的文献综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(1):31-40. doi: 10.1080/02813430802588907.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence.综合护理的效果:对英国及国际证据的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 10;18(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3.
2
Attitudes of medical doctors and nurses towards the role of the nurses in the primary care unit in Italy.意大利医生和护士对护士在基层医疗单位中角色的态度。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Jul;19(4):407-415. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000846. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
3
Models of primary care for frail patients.体弱患者的初级保健模式。
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Jul;61(7):601-6.
4
Effectiveness of a transitional home care program in reducing acute hospital utilization: a quasi-experimental study.过渡性家庭护理计划在减少急性医院利用率方面的有效性:一项准实验研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 14;15:100. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0750-2.
5
The effect of a virtual ward program on emergency services utilization and quality of life in frail elderly patients after discharge: a pilot study.虚拟病房项目对体弱老年患者出院后急诊服务利用及生活质量的影响:一项试点研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Feb 3;10:413-20. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S68937. eCollection 2015.
6
Support for home care.居家护理支持。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Jan;57(1):22.
7
Developmental disability application.发育障碍申请。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Jan;57(1):21.

本文引用的文献

1
Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.通过提供居家医院护理避免住院:对个体患者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2009 Jan 20;180(2):175-82. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081491.
2
Home-based intermediate care program vs hospitalization: Cost comparison study.居家中级护理项目与住院治疗:成本比较研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Jan;54(1):66-73.
3
Outcome evaluation of a randomized trial of the PhoenixCare intervention: program of case management and coordinated care for the seriously chronically ill.PhoenixCare干预措施随机试验的结果评估:针对严重慢性病患者的病例管理与协调护理计划
J Palliat Med. 2006 Feb;9(1):111-26. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.111.
4
Family physicians and home care agencies--valuing each other's roles in primary care.家庭医生与家庭护理机构——重视彼此在初级保健中的作用。
Healthc Q. 2004;7(4):49-52. doi: 10.12927/hcq..16814.
5
Being community-responsive physicians. Doing the right thing.成为响应社区需求的医生。做正确的事。
Can Fam Physician. 2004 Jul;50:1004-10.
6
Hospital at home for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review of evidence.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者的居家医院治疗:证据的系统评价
BMJ. 2004 Aug 7;329(7461):315. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38159.650347.55. Epub 2004 Jul 8.
7
Evolving the delivery of acute care services in the home.
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2003;22(1):55-74. doi: 10.1300/J027v22n01_04.
8
[Hospital care at home; a review of the literature on the effects of a form of transmural care].[居家医院护理;关于一种跨壁护理形式效果的文献综述]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Nov 30;146(48):2302-8.
9
Work in progress. Integrating physicians' services in the home.进行中。整合家庭医生服务。
Can Fam Physician. 2001 Dec;47:2502-9.
10
The future history of home care and physician house calls in the United States.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Oct;56(10):M603-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.10.m603.