Suppr超能文献

质子与强度调制光子放射治疗肝癌后第二恶性肿瘤的风险。

Risk of second malignant neoplasm following proton versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 7;55(23):7055-65. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/S07. Epub 2010 Nov 12.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the sixth most common cancer in the world, is a global health concern. Radiotherapy for HCC is uncommon, largely because of the likelihood of radiation-induced liver disease, an acute side effect that is often fatal. Proton beam therapy (PBT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may offer HCC patients a better option for treating the diseased liver tissue while largely sparing the surrounding tissues, especially the non-tumor liver. However, even advanced radiotherapies carry a risk of late effects, including second malignant neoplasms (SMNs). It is unclear whether PBT or IMRT confers less risk of an SMN than the other. The purpose of this study was to compare the predicted risk of developing an SMN for a patient with HCC between PBT and IMRT. For both treatments, radiation doses in organs and tissues from primary radiation were determined using a treatment planning system; doses in organs and tissues from stray radiation from PBT were determined using Monte Carlo simulations and from IMRT using thermo-luminescent dosimeter measurements. Risk models of SMN incidence were taken from the literature. The predicted absolute lifetime attributable risks of SMN incidence were 11.4% after PBT and 19.2% after IMRT. The results of this study suggest that using proton beams instead of photon beams for radiotherapy may reduce the risk of SMN incidence for some HCC patients.

摘要

肝细胞癌 (HCC) 是全球第六大常见癌症,也是全球关注的健康问题。 HCC 的放射治疗并不常见,主要是因为可能发生放射性肝损伤,这是一种常见的急性副作用,通常是致命的。质子束治疗 (PBT) 和调强放射治疗 (IMRT) 可能为 HCC 患者提供更好的治疗患病肝脏组织的选择,同时很大程度上保护周围组织,特别是非肿瘤肝脏。然而,即使是先进的放射治疗也有发生晚期效应的风险,包括第二恶性肿瘤 (SMN)。目前尚不清楚 PBT 或 IMRT 是否比另一种治疗方法具有更低的 SMN 风险。本研究的目的是比较 HCC 患者接受 PBT 和 IMRT 治疗时,SMN 发生风险的预测值。对于两种治疗方法,使用治疗计划系统确定来自初级辐射的器官和组织中的辐射剂量;使用蒙特卡罗模拟确定来自 PBT 的散射线和来自 IMRT 的热释光剂量计测量的器官和组织中的剂量。SMN 发病风险模型取自文献。PBT 后 SMN 发病的预测绝对终生归因风险为 11.4%,IMRT 后为 19.2%。本研究结果表明,对于某些 HCC 患者,使用质子束而不是光子束进行放射治疗可能会降低 SMN 发病的风险。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy.减轻中枢神经系统的放射毒性:质子治疗的作用。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Nov;24(11):1524-1549. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01131-x. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review.质子束治疗巨大肝血管瘤:一例报告及文献综述。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 3;27:152-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.014. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Risk-optimized proton therapy to minimize radiogenic second cancers.风险优化质子治疗以尽量减少放射性继发癌症。
Phys Med Biol. 2015 May 21;60(10):3999-4013. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/10/3999. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
The physics of proton therapy.质子治疗的物理学原理。
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Apr 21;60(8):R155-209. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/R155. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.光子颅脊柱照射野外剂量的分析模型。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 7;58(21):7463-79. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/21/7463. Epub 2013 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验