Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care of the University of Antwerp, Belgium, General Practice, Universiteitsplein 1, Geb R, 3de verd,, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Nov 15;11:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-88.
Overuse of emergency departments (ED) is of concern in Western society and it is often referred to as 'inappropriate' use. This phenomenon may compromise efficient use of health care personnel, infrastructure and financial resources of the ED. To redirect patients, an extensive knowledge of the experiences and attitudes of patients and their choice behaviour is necessary. The aim of this study is to quantify the patients and socio-economical determinants for choosing the general practitioner (GP) on call or the ED.
Data collection was conducted simultaneously in 4 large cities in Belgium. All patients who visited EDs or used the services of the GP on call during two weekends in January 2005 were enrolled in the study in a prospective manner. We used semi-structured questionnaires to interview patients from both services.
1611 patient contacts were suitable for further analysis. 640 patients visited the GP and 971 went to the ED. Determinants that associated with the choice of the ED are: being male, having visited the ED during the past 12 months at least once, speaking another language than Dutch or French, being of African (sub-Saharan as well as North African) nationality and no medical insurance. We also found that young men are more likely to seek help at the ED for minor trauma, compared to women.
Patients tend to seek help at the service they are acquainted with. Two populations that distinctively seek help at the ED for minor medical problems are people of foreign origin and men suffering minor trauma. Aiming at a redirection of patients, special attention should go to these patients. Informing them about the health services' specific tasks and the needlessness of technical examinations for minor trauma, might be a useful intervention.
在西方社会,急诊部门(ED)的过度使用令人担忧,通常被称为“不适当”的使用。这种现象可能会影响到医疗保健人员、ED 的基础设施和财务资源的有效利用。为了重新引导患者,需要广泛了解患者的经验、态度和选择行为。本研究的目的是量化选择值班全科医生或急诊的患者和社会经济决定因素。
数据收集在比利时的 4 个大城市同时进行。2005 年 1 月的两个周末期间,所有到 ED 就诊或使用值班全科医生服务的患者都前瞻性地被纳入本研究。我们使用半结构式问卷对来自这两种服务的患者进行访谈。
共纳入 1611 例患者。640 例患者就诊于全科医生,971 例患者就诊于 ED。与选择 ED 相关的决定因素有:男性、过去 12 个月至少去过一次 ED、会说荷兰语或法语以外的语言、来自非洲(撒哈拉以南非洲和北非)国家且没有医疗保险。我们还发现,与女性相比,年轻男性更有可能因轻微创伤到 ED 寻求帮助。
患者倾向于到他们熟悉的服务机构寻求帮助。两个明显因轻微医疗问题到 ED 寻求帮助的人群是外国人和遭受轻微创伤的男性。为了重新引导患者,应特别关注这些患者。告知他们有关卫生服务的具体任务和对轻微创伤进行技术检查的必要性,可能是一种有用的干预措施。