Evans Heather L, Zonies David H, Warner Keir J, Bulger Eileen M, Sharar Sam R, Maier Ronald V, Cuschieri Joseph
Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, 98104, USA.
Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;145(11):1041-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.239.
In an emergency medical system with established rapid-sequence intubation protocols, prehospital (PH) intubation of patients with trauma is not associated with a higher rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) than emergency department (ED) intubation.
Retrospective observational cohort.
Level I trauma center.
Adult patients with trauma intubated in a PH or an ED setting from July 1, 2007, through July 31, 2008.
Diagnosis of VAP by means of bronchoscopic alveolar lavage or clinical assessment when bronchoscopic alveolar lavage was impossible. Secondary outcomes included time to VAP, length of hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality.
Of 572 patients, 412 (72.0%) underwent PH intubation. The ED group was older than the PH group (mean ages, 46.4 vs 39.1 years; P < .001) and had a higher incidence of blunt injury (142 [88.8%] vs 322 [78.2%]; P = .002). The mean (SD) lowest recorded ED systolic blood pressure was lower in the ED group (102.8 [1.9] vs 111.4 [1.2] mm Hg; P < .001), despite similar mean injury severity scores in both groups (27.2 [0.7] vs 27.0 [1.1]; P = .94). There was no difference in the mean rate of VAP (30 [18.8%] vs 71 [17.2%]; P = .66) or mean time to diagnosis (8.1 [1.2] vs 7.8 [1.0] days; P = .89). Logistic regression analysis identified history of drug abuse, lowest recorded ED systolic blood pressure, and injury severity score as 3 independent factors predictive of VAP.
Prehospital intubation of patients with trauma is not associated with higher risk of VAP. Further investigation of intubation factors and the incidence and timing of aspiration is required to identify potentially modifiable factors to prevent VAP.
在一个已建立快速顺序插管方案的紧急医疗系统中,创伤患者的院前(PH)插管与急诊科(ED)插管相比,呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发生率并不更高。
回顾性观察队列研究。
一级创伤中心。
2007年7月1日至2008年7月31日期间在院前或急诊科进行插管的成年创伤患者。
通过支气管肺泡灌洗诊断VAP,若无法进行支气管肺泡灌洗则通过临床评估诊断。次要结局包括发生VAP的时间、住院时间和院内死亡率。
572例患者中,412例(72.0%)接受了院前插管。急诊科组患者比院前组患者年龄更大(平均年龄分别为46.4岁和39.1岁;P <.001),钝性损伤发生率更高(142例[88.8%]对322例[78.2%];P =.002)。尽管两组的平均损伤严重程度评分相似(分别为27.2[0.7]和27.0[1.1];P =.94),但急诊科组记录到的最低收缩压均值更低(102.8[1.9]mmHg对111.4[1.2]mmHg;P <.001)。VAP的平均发生率(30例[18.8%]对71例[17.2%];P =.66)或平均诊断时间(8.1[1.2]天对7.8[1.0]天;P =.89)没有差异。逻辑回归分析确定药物滥用史、记录到的最低急诊科收缩压和损伤严重程度评分是预测VAP的3个独立因素。
创伤患者的院前插管与VAP的较高风险无关。需要进一步研究插管因素以及误吸的发生率和时间,以确定潜在的可改变因素来预防VAP。