Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, England CB2 0QQ.
Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):583-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100912. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
To compare the image quality of water-only images generated from a dual-echo Dixon technique with that of standard fast spin-echo T1-weighted chemical shift fat-suppressed images obtained in patients evaluated for pelvic pain with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) system.
The ethics board granted approval for this retrospective study; patient consent was not required. Twenty-five women underwent both standard axial T1-weighted fast spin-echo chemical shift fat-suppressed imaging and dual-echo Dixon imaging of the pelvis. Two readers independently scored the acquisitions for image quality, fat suppression quality, and artifact. On the basis of signal intensity measurements, the uniformity of fat suppression, the contrast between fat-suppressed and non-fat-suppressed tissue, and the contrast between pathologic lesions and suppressed fat were calculated. Values obtained with the T1-weighted fat-suppressed and dual-echo Dixon techniques were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
The images generated with the dual-echo Dixon technique were of higher quality, had better fat suppression, and had less artifact (qualitative scores: 4.4, 4.6, and 4.0, respectively) compared with the standard T1-weighted fat-suppressed images (qualitative scores: 3.4, 3.3, and 3.6, respectively; P < .01). Contrast between fat-suppressed and non-fat-suppressed tissue (contrast ratio: 0.86 for dual-echo Dixon technique vs 0.42 for T1-weighted fat-suppressed technique, P < .001) and between pathologic lesions and suppressed fat (contrast ratio: 0.88 for dual-echo Dixon technique vs 0.57 for T1-weighted fat-suppressed technique, P =.012) was significantly improved with the dual-echo Dixon technique. Twelve pathologic lesions were identified with dual-echo Dixon imaging versus eight that were identified with T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging.
Compared with standard T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging, dual-echo Dixon imaging facilitates improved image quality of fat-suppressed images of the pelvis, enabling better delineation of pathologic lesions.
比较在 1.5T 磁共振(MR)系统上评估盆腔疼痛患者时,双回波 Dixon 技术生成的纯水图像与标准快速自旋回波 T1 加权化学位移脂肪抑制图像的图像质量。
本研究经伦理委员会批准,患者无需知情同意。25 例女性患者均行标准轴位 T1 加权快速自旋回波化学位移脂肪抑制成像和双回波 Dixon 成像。两位读者独立对采集图像的质量、脂肪抑制质量和伪影进行评分。基于信号强度测量,计算脂肪抑制的均匀性、脂肪抑制与非脂肪抑制组织之间的对比度以及病变与抑制脂肪之间的对比度。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较 T1 加权脂肪抑制和双回波 Dixon 技术获得的值。
与标准 T1 加权脂肪抑制图像(定性评分:3.4、3.3 和 3.6)相比,双回波 Dixon 技术生成的图像质量更高、脂肪抑制效果更好、伪影更少(定性评分:4.4、4.6 和 4.0)(P <.01)。脂肪抑制与非脂肪抑制组织之间的对比度(对比比:双回波 Dixon 技术为 0.86,T1 加权脂肪抑制技术为 0.42,P <.001)和病变与抑制脂肪之间的对比度(对比比:双回波 Dixon 技术为 0.88,T1 加权脂肪抑制技术为 0.57,P =.012)均显著提高。双回波 Dixon 成像可检出 12 个病变,而 T1 加权脂肪抑制成像仅检出 8 个病变。
与标准 T1 加权脂肪抑制成像相比,双回波 Dixon 成像有助于改善盆腔脂肪抑制图像的质量,更好地描绘病变。