Cornfeld Daniel M, Israel Gary, McCarthy Shirley M, Weinreb Jeffery C
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;28(1):121-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21402.
To compare two T1-weighted (T1W) fat-suppressed sequences for 3D breath-hold pre- and postcontrast fat-suppressed T1W imaging of the female pelvis at 3T.
Pelvic MRI scans of 16 female patients were retrospectively identified who were scanned with two 3D breath-hold sequences: 1) a fast spoiled gradient echo sequence with spectral inversion at lipids (SPECIAL) (called 3D FSPGR), and 2) a dual-echo two-point Dixon (DE Dixon) sequence. Contrast between soft tissue and fat, soft tissue and fluid, and fat and fluid was measured on pre- and postcontrast images. Additionally, two readers subjectively scored the images for degree and homogeneity of fat suppression plus presence and severity of artifacts.
Contrast between muscle and myometrium to fat was improved with the Dixon technique (0.61 vs. 0.09 and 0.7 vs. 0.3, respectively, P < 0.001). Both readers agreed that fat suppression was stronger with the Dixon sequence (P < 0.001 and P = 0.06). Artifacts were equivalent (P = 0.53 and 0.65).
The 3D DE Dixon sequence achieved stronger fat suppression in the female pelvis when compared to a 3D FSPGR sequence with SPECIAL.
比较两种T1加权(T1W)脂肪抑制序列,用于3T下女性骨盆的三维屏气对比剂增强前和增强后脂肪抑制T1W成像。
回顾性纳入16例女性患者的盆腔MRI扫描数据,这些患者采用两种三维屏气序列进行扫描:1)一种具有脂质谱反转的快速扰相梯度回波序列(SPECIAL)(称为三维快速扰相梯度回波序列),以及2)双回波两点 Dixon(DE Dixon)序列。在对比剂增强前和增强后的图像上测量软组织与脂肪、软组织与液体以及脂肪与液体之间的对比度。此外,两名阅片者对图像的脂肪抑制程度和均匀性以及伪影的存在和严重程度进行主观评分。
Dixon技术提高了肌肉和子宫肌层与脂肪之间的对比度(分别为0.61对0.09和0.7对0.3,P < 0.001)。两名阅片者均认为Dixon序列的脂肪抑制效果更强(P < 0.001和P = 0.06)。伪影情况相当(P = 0.53和0.65)。
与具有SPECIAL的三维快速扰相梯度回波序列相比,三维DE Dixon序列在女性骨盆中实现了更强的脂肪抑制。