• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用线性切割缝合器行根治性膀胱切除术后原位回肠膀胱替代术

Orthotopic ileal bladder substitution following radical cystectomy using the linear-cutter stapling device.

作者信息

Abou-Elela Ashraf, Abou-Elela Amr, Alfaiomy Hany, Elshafei Ahmed

机构信息

Cairo University, As-Salam International Hospital, Maadi, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2010 Oct;20:245-50.

PMID:21082574
Abstract

We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and potential benefits of using the linear-cutter staplers in the ileal reanastomosis and ileal pouch reconstruction following radical cystectomy in patients with invasive carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileal bladder substitution procedures were performed in 40 patients with invasive carcinoma of the urinary bladder. In 20 patients the linear- cutter stapling device was used for the ileo-ilial reanastomosis and reconstruction of the pouch, while in the other 20 patients the standard hand-suturing technique was used. Using the linear-cutter stapler in the ileo-ileal reanastromasis and ileal pouch reconstruction saved approximately 60 to 90 minutes of operative time, and there was also a significant reduction of blood loss during this period. The leakage rate and hospital stay were less in patients with a stapled pouch. Urodynamic characteristics were comparable to standard ileal neobladders.

摘要

我们评估了在浸润性膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术后行回肠再吻合术和回肠膀胱重建术中使用直线切割缝合器的安全性、有效性及潜在益处。对40例浸润性膀胱癌患者实施了根治性膀胱切除术和原位回肠膀胱替代术。其中20例患者使用直线切割缝合器进行回肠-回肠再吻合和膀胱重建,另外20例患者采用标准手工缝合技术。在回肠-回肠再吻合和回肠膀胱重建中使用直线切割缝合器节省了约60至90分钟的手术时间,且在此期间失血量也显著减少。使用吻合器重建膀胱的患者渗漏率更低,住院时间更短。尿动力学特征与标准回肠新膀胱相当。

相似文献

1
Orthotopic ileal bladder substitution following radical cystectomy using the linear-cutter stapling device.使用线性切割缝合器行根治性膀胱切除术后原位回肠膀胱替代术
Surg Technol Int. 2010 Oct;20:245-50.
2
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in female patients: technique with preservation of the uterus and vagina.女性患者的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术及尿流改道术:保留子宫和阴道的技术
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Mar;198(3):386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.010.
3
Decreasing blood loss in patients treated with radical cystectomy: a prospective randomizes trial using a new stapling device.
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):951-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051372.67213.ca.
4
[Clinical study of radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction in elderly patients with bladder cancer].老年膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术及尿路重建的临床研究
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1999 Jan;45(1):19-23.
5
Radical cystectomy with W-shaped orthotopic ileal neobladder constructed with non-absorbable titanium staples-long term follow-up.根治性膀胱切除术联合 W 形非吸收性钛钉原位回肠代膀胱术——长期随访结果
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Mar-Apr;39(2):167-72. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.02.03.
6
[Results of radical cystectomy for management of invasive bladder cancer with special reference to prognostic factors and quality of life depending on the type of urinary diversion].[根治性膀胱切除术治疗浸润性膀胱癌的结果,特别提及根据尿流改道类型的预后因素和生活质量]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2000;46:217-29.
7
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder: report of 33 cases.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术加原位回肠新膀胱术:33例报告
Chin Med J (Engl). 2005 Jan 5;118(1):27-33.
8
Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance.根治性膀胱切除术联合回肠导管改道术:机器人辅助影响的早期前瞻性评估
BJU Int. 2006 Nov;98(5):1059-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06372.x. Epub 2006 Jun 26.
9
Ileocaecal vs ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a comparative study.膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术后回盲部新膀胱与回肠新膀胱的比较研究
BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):799-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05996.x.
10
Modified N-shaped ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后改良 N 形回肠新膀胱。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):366-71. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Jun 17.