• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机临床试验:米拉拉克 vs. 高力替利——结肠镜检查肠道准备中疗效和患者耐受性的对照研究。

Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, 97239, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04493.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04493.x
PMID:21083586
Abstract

BACKGROUND

MiraLAX is gaining acceptance as a bowel cleanser for colonoscopy. We hypothesize that MiraLAX/Gatorade is as efficacious for bowel cleansing as Golytely and is more tolerable for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

AIM

To compare bowel preparation scores of MiraLAX/Gatorade vs. Golytely and examine differences in patient tolerability.

METHODS

Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy were randomized to 4 L Golytely or 238 g MiraLAX in 64 ounces Golytely and four bisacodyl tablets. Efficacy in bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BPPS). Subjects completed a brief survey assessing patient tolerability.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients were enrolled (85 male, 105 female; mean age 56.9 years, s.d. 6.3); 87 were randomized to MiraLAX, 103 to Golytely. There was no difference in age, gender or timing of colonoscopy between the bowel preparation groups. Golytely's median total BBPS score was significantly higher than that of MiraLAX [9 (IQR 7-9) vs. 8 (IQR 6-9), P = 0.034]. Golytely had a higher rate of an excellent equivalent BBPS score of 8 or 9 than MiraLAX (70% vs. 55%, P = 0.036). There was no difference in patient tolerability (P = 0.857).

CONCLUSIONS

Golytely was more efficacious than MiraLAX/Gatorade in bowel cleansing; both preparations were equally tolerated by patients.

摘要

背景

米拉拉克(MiraLAX)作为结肠镜检查的肠道清洁剂逐渐被认可。我们假设米拉拉克/佳得乐(Gatorade)在肠道清洁方面与甘油果糖(Golytely)一样有效,并且对于接受筛查性结肠镜检查的患者更具耐受性。

目的

比较米拉拉克/佳得乐与甘油果糖的肠道准备评分,并检查患者耐受性的差异。

方法

接受筛查性结肠镜检查的患者被随机分为 4 升甘油果糖或 238 克米拉拉克加 64 盎司佳得乐和 4 片比沙可啶。使用波士顿肠道准备量表(Boston Bowel Preparation Scale,BPPS)评估肠道清洁的效果。受试者完成了一份简短的调查,评估患者的耐受性。

结果

共纳入 190 例患者(85 例男性,105 例女性;平均年龄 56.9 岁,标准差 6.3);87 例随机分为米拉拉克组,103 例随机分为甘油果糖组。两组肠道准备的年龄、性别和结肠镜检查时间无差异。甘油果糖的总 BPPS 评分中位数明显高于米拉拉克组[9(IQR 7-9)比 8(IQR 6-9),P=0.034]。甘油果糖的优秀等效 BPPS 评分(8 或 9)比例高于米拉拉克组(70%比 55%,P=0.036)。患者的耐受性无差异(P=0.857)。

结论

在肠道清洁方面,甘油果糖比米拉拉克/佳得乐更有效;两种制剂对患者的耐受性相同。

相似文献

1
Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.随机临床试验:米拉拉克 vs. 高力替利——结肠镜检查肠道准备中疗效和患者耐受性的对照研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04493.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
2
Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade is an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study.Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade 是一种有效、安全且耐受良好的低危患者肠道准备选择:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1036-42. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.115. Epub 2012 May 8.
3
MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate?米拉拉克 vs. 高力乐:腺瘤检出率有显著差异吗?
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;34(7):775-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04795.x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
4
MiraLAX is not as effective as GoLytely in bowel cleansing before screening colonoscopies.米拉拉克在筛查结肠镜检查前的肠道清洁中不如加来他利有效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Apr;9(4):326-332.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 27.
5
MiraLAX-Gatorade bowel prep versus GoLytely before screening colonoscopy: an endoscopic database study in a community hospital.米拉拉克-佳得乐肠道准备与聚乙二醇电解质溶液在筛查结肠镜检查前的比较:社区医院内镜数据库研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov-Dec;46(10):e96-e100. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182617bfb.
6
Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial.聚乙二醇与磷酸钠用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验
Endoscopy. 2005 Jun;37(6):537-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861315.
7
Fractional cleansing of the large bowel with "Golytely" for colonoscopic preparation: a controlled trial.
Endoscopy. 1987 Sep;19(5):198-200. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018281.
8
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.相较于使用常规剂量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液进行结肠镜检查准备,先给予橄榄油再给予少量聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液可提高患者对右侧结肠清洁的满意度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
9
A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Apr;85(4):422-7.
10
Colonoscopy preparation: polyethylene glycol with Gatorade is as safe and efficacious as four liters of polyethylene glycol with balanced electrolytes.结肠镜检查准备:含佳得乐的聚乙二醇与含电解质平衡液的四升聚乙二醇同样安全有效。
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Dec;57(12):3098-105. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2266-5. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Consequences of poly(ethylene oxide) and poloxamer P188 on transcription in healthy and stressed myoblasts.聚氧乙烯和泊洛沙姆 P188 对健康和应激成肌细胞转录的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 2;120(18):e2219885120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219885120. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study.运动饮料与水在肠道准备中的疗效和耐受性:一项随机对照研究。
Trials. 2022 Aug 26;23(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2.
3
Impact of high-volume, intermediate-volume and low-volume bowel preparation on colonoscopy quality and patient satisfaction: An observational study.
大容量、中容量和小容量肠道准备对结肠镜检查质量和患者满意度的影响:一项观察性研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb;7(1):114-124. doi: 10.1177/2050640618809842. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
4
Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.比较竞争结肠镜准备方案的真实世界疗效:一项前瞻性试验的结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;114(2):305-314. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000057.
5
Polyethylene Glycol-3350 (Miralax®)+1.9-L sports drink (Gatorade®)+2 tablets of bisacodyl results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with Polyethylene Glycol-Ascorbic Acid (MoviPrep®).与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸(MoviPrep®)相比,聚乙二醇 - 3350(Miralax®)+ 1.9升运动饮料(佳得乐®)+ 2片比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查的肠道准备效果较差。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;29(1):67-74. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17536.
6
Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation in asymptomatic patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy.平均风险筛查结肠镜检查无症状患者肠道准备不佳的预测因素
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Sep 16;8(17):616-22. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i17.616.
7
Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: Balancing efficacy, safety, cost and patient tolerance.结肠镜检查前的肠道准备:平衡疗效、安全性、成本和患者耐受性。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan 10;8(1):4-12. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.4.
8
Nationwide variability of colonoscopy preparation instructions.结肠镜检查准备说明的全国变异性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Aug;59(8):1726-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3262-8. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
9
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.波士顿肠道准备量表评分提供了一个用于描述肠道清洁程度是否足够的标准化定义。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
Validity of a Web-based educational program to disseminate a standardized bowel preparation rating scale.一个基于网络的教育项目用于传播标准化肠道准备评分量表的有效性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov-Dec;48(10):856-61. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000028.