Suppr超能文献

米拉拉克 vs. 高力乐:腺瘤检出率有显著差异吗?

MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate?

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;34(7):775-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04795.x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent clinical trials (RCT) of bowel preparation, Golytely was more efficacious than MiraLAX. We hypothesised that there is a difference in adenoma detection between Golytely and MiraLAX.

AIMS

To compare the adenoma detection rate (ADR) between these bowel preparations, and to identify independent predictors of bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of an RCT that assessed efficacy and patient tolerability of Golytely vs. MiraLAX/Gatorade in average risk screening colonoscopy patients. Bowel preparation quality was measured with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). An excellent/good equivalent BBPS score was defined as ≥ 7. Polyp pathology review was performed. ADR was defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with an adenoma. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety patients were prospectively enrolled (87 MiraLAX, 103 Golytely). Golytely had a higher rate of a BBPS score ≥ 7 (82.5% vs. MiraLAX 67.8%, P=0.02). The ADR in the Golytely cohort was 26.2% (27/103), and was 16.1% (14/87) for MiraLAX (P = 0.091). On multivariate analyses, Golytely was 2.13 × more likely to be associated with a BBPS ≥ 7 (95% CI 1.05-4.32, P = 0.04) and 2.28 × more likely to be associated with adenoma detection (95% CI 1.05-4.98, P = 0.04) than MiraLAX.

CONCLUSIONS

Golytely was more efficacious than MiraLAX in bowel cleansing, and was independently associated with both bowel prep quality (BBPS ≥ 7) and higher adenoma detection. Golytely should be used as first line for bowel prep for colonoscopy. Studies with larger populations are needed to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

在最近的肠道准备临床试验(RCT)中,Golytely 比 MiraLAX 更有效。我们假设 Golytely 和 MiraLAX 之间在腺瘤检出率(ADR)上存在差异。

目的

比较这两种肠道准备方法的腺瘤检出率(ADR),并确定影响肠道准备质量和腺瘤检出的独立预测因素。

方法

这是一项 RCT 的事后分析,该 RCT 评估了 Golytely 与 MiraLAX/Gatorade 在平均风险筛查结肠镜检查患者中的疗效和患者耐受性。肠道准备质量采用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)进行测量。将 BBPS 评分≥7 定义为优秀/良好等效评分。进行息肉病理复查。ADR 定义为结肠镜检查中存在腺瘤的比例。进行单变量和多变量分析。

结果

前瞻性纳入 190 例患者(MiraLAX 87 例,Golytely 103 例)。Golytely 的 BBPS 评分≥7 的比例更高(82.5%比 MiraLAX 67.8%,P=0.02)。Golytely 组的 ADR 为 26.2%(27/103),MiraLAX 组为 16.1%(14/87)(P=0.091)。多变量分析显示,Golytely 与 BBPS≥7 的关联是 MiraLAX 的 2.13 倍(95%CI 1.05-4.32,P=0.04),与腺瘤检出的关联是 MiraLAX 的 2.28 倍(95%CI 1.05-4.98,P=0.04)。

结论

Golytely 在肠道清洁方面比 MiraLAX 更有效,与肠道准备质量(BBPS≥7)和更高的腺瘤检出率均独立相关。Golytely 应为结肠镜检查的首选肠道准备药物。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验