• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.比较竞争结肠镜准备方案的真实世界疗效:一项前瞻性试验的结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;114(2):305-314. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000057.
2
Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade is an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study.Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade 是一种有效、安全且耐受良好的低危患者肠道准备选择:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1036-42. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.115. Epub 2012 May 8.
3
MiraLAX-Gatorade bowel prep versus GoLytely before screening colonoscopy: an endoscopic database study in a community hospital.米拉拉克-佳得乐肠道准备与聚乙二醇电解质溶液在筛查结肠镜检查前的比较:社区医院内镜数据库研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov-Dec;46(10):e96-e100. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182617bfb.
4
A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.前瞻性研究低容量聚乙二醇(2L)与标准容量聚乙二醇(4L)、枸橼酸镁联合刺激性泻药在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的疗效、安全性和可接受性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;46(7):595-601. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432162.
5
'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial.“皮科-贝洛-克莱恩研究”:结肠镜检查前肠道准备药物比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁和聚乙二醇的有效性及患者耐受性。一项单盲随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000192.
6
MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate?米拉拉克 vs. 高力乐:腺瘤检出率有显著差异吗?
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;34(7):775-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04795.x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
7
Polyethylene Glycol-3350 (Miralax®)+1.9-L sports drink (Gatorade®)+2 tablets of bisacodyl results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with Polyethylene Glycol-Ascorbic Acid (MoviPrep®).与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸(MoviPrep®)相比,聚乙二醇 - 3350(Miralax®)+ 1.9升运动饮料(佳得乐®)+ 2片比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查的肠道准备效果较差。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;29(1):67-74. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17536.
8
Plenvu - a low-volume PEG-based colonoscopy preparation.普伦武——一种基于低容量聚乙二醇的结肠镜检查准备药物。
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2019 Jan 28;61(1564):11-14.
9
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy.一项关于结肠镜检查低容量肠道准备方法的疗效和耐受性的随机前瞻性试验。
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Feb;47(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Splitting the Difference: What Is the Best Colonoscopy Prep?权衡差异:最佳的结肠镜检查肠道准备方法是什么?
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jun;70(6):1948-1950. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09081-0. Epub 2025 May 1.
2
Severe Constipation, Fecalith, and Giant Fecaloma in a Patient With Severe Intellectual Disabilities: A Case Report.重度智力残疾患者的严重便秘、粪石与巨大粪块:一例报告
Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79099. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Colonoscopy Findings and Colorectal Cancer Deaths in a Nation-Wide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.全国结直肠癌筛查项目中肠道准备质量对结肠镜检查结果和结直肠癌死亡的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;119(10):2036-2044. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002880. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Editorial: Pediatric endoscopy and sedation-volume II.社论:儿科内镜检查与镇静——第二卷
Front Pediatr. 2024 Apr 3;12:1403090. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1403090. eCollection 2024.
5
A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination.一种新型口味 PEG 和硫酸盐溶液与一种非处方轻泻剂、PEG 和运动饮料肠道准备组合的 2 期评估。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8.
6
Bowel cleansing effectiveness and safety of 1L PEG + Asc in the real-world setting: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study of over 13000 patients.1L聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸在现实环境中的肠道清洁效果及安全性:对13000多名患者的观察性、回顾性、多中心研究
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Aug 16;11(8):E785-E793. doi: 10.1055/a-2125-0025. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature.影响结肠镜检查困难患者肠道准备质量的因素:来自文献的证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 21;29(11):1685-1707. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1685.
8
Measuring and Improving Quality of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.测量与提高用于结直肠癌筛查的结肠镜检查质量。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;24(3):269-283. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
9
The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study.运动饮料与水在肠道准备中的疗效和耐受性:一项随机对照研究。
Trials. 2022 Aug 26;23(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2.
10
Calcium Citrate Versus Calcium Carbonate in the Management of Chronic Hypoparathyroidism: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Clinical Trial.柠檬酸钙与碳酸钙在慢性甲状旁腺功能减退症治疗中的比较:一项随机、双盲、交叉临床试验。
J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Jul;37(7):1251-1259. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4564. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.与结肠镜检查准备质量相关的患者特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):357-369.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
Phosphate tablets or polyethylene glycol for preparation to colonoscopy? A multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.磷酸片剂还是聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查准备?一项多中心非劣效性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2166-2173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5214-1. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
4
Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme.分剂量准备用于结肠镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率:一项在有组织筛查计划中的随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Feb;66(2):270-277. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
Split-Dose Preparations Are Superior to Day-Before Bowel Cleansing Regimens: A Meta-analysis.分剂量制剂优于前一天肠道准备方案:一项荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):79-88. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Is polyethylene glycol superior to miralax-gatorade in bowel preparations for colonoscopy?在结肠镜检查的肠道准备中,聚乙二醇是否优于聚乙二醇电解质散-佳得乐?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;110(4):596-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.35.
7
Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score.预测接受分次肠道准备的参与者结肠镜检查肠道准备不足:预测评分的制定和验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
8
Bowel preparation before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前的肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr;81(4):781-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.048. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: a systematic review.解释非裔美国人结肠镜癌筛查持续未充分利用的原因:一项系统综述
Prev Med. 2015 Feb;71:40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.022. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
10
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):72-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.385. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

比较竞争结肠镜准备方案的真实世界疗效:一项前瞻性试验的结果。

Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;114(2):305-314. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000057.

DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000057
PMID:30730859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6551000/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

National societies provide little guidance regarding which colonoscopy bowel preps are best tolerated and most effective; this reflects a lack of comparative effectiveness studies that directly evaluate the available preps in a "real-world" setting. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective, commercially unfunded comparative effectiveness study of currently available bowel preps and measured their impact on bowel cleansing.

METHODS

We included patients aged ≥18 years, who presented for an outpatient colonoscopy at a large medical center serving more than 70 academic and community-based endoscopists who are free to prescribe the bowel prep of their choice. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing quality as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. We performed regression models with random effects on the outcomes to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS

Approximately 4,339 colonoscopies were performed by 75 endoscopists. Magnesium citrate, MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, OsmoPrep, Prepopik/Clenpiq, and Suprep all had significantly higher prep tolerability compared with GoLYTELY (all P < 0.05). For bowel cleansing, Suprep (7.28 ± 1.66; P < 0.001), MoviPrep (7.11 ± 1.62; P = 0.004), and MiraLAX with Gatorade (7.09 ± 1.64; P < 0.001) had higher total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores compared with GoLYTELY (6.67 ± 1.87); there were no significant differences among the remaining preps. Split-prep dosing was associated with better cleansing; however, men, opioid and tricyclic antidepressent users, and patients with diabetes and cirrhosis had worse cleansing (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective, real-world comparative effectiveness study of available bowel preps, we found that MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, and Suprep were prospectively associated with superior tolerability and bowel cleansing.

摘要

目的

国家协会几乎没有提供关于哪种结肠镜检查肠道准备最耐受和最有效的指导;这反映了缺乏直接在“真实世界”环境中评估现有准备的比较效果研究。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项前瞻性、无商业资助的现有肠道准备比较效果研究,并测量了它们对肠道清洁的影响。

方法

我们纳入了年龄≥18 岁的患者,这些患者在一家大型医疗中心接受门诊结肠镜检查,该中心服务于 70 多名学术和社区为基础的内镜医生,他们可以自由选择肠道准备的药物。主要结局是通过波士顿肠道准备量表测量的肠道清洁质量。我们对结果进行了带有随机效应的回归模型,以调整混杂因素。

结果

大约 4339 例结肠镜检查由 75 名内镜医生进行。柠檬酸镁、MiraLAX 与佳得乐、MoviPrep、OsmoPrep、Prepopik/Clenpiq 和 Suprep 与 Golytely 相比,肠道准备的耐受性明显更高(所有 P<0.05)。对于肠道清洁,Suprep(7.28±1.66;P<0.001)、MoviPrep(7.11±1.62;P=0.004)和 MiraLAX 与佳得乐(7.09±1.64;P<0.001)的总波士顿肠道准备量表评分均高于 Golytely(6.67±1.87);其余准备之间没有显著差异。分剂量准备与更好的清洁相关;然而,男性、阿片类药物和三环类抗抑郁药使用者以及患有糖尿病和肝硬化的患者清洁效果较差(所有 P<0.05)。

结论

在这项前瞻性、真实世界的现有肠道准备比较效果研究中,我们发现 MiraLAX 与佳得乐、MoviPrep 和 Suprep 与更好的耐受性和肠道清洁相关。