Suppr超能文献

电外科血管密封设备在猪模型胆道手术中的评估。

An evaluation of electrosurgical vessel-sealing devices in biliary tract surgery in a porcine model.

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2010 Dec;12(10):703-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00240.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate two electrosurgical vessel-sealing devices in biliary surgery.

METHODS

Porcine common bile ducts (CBDs) were sealed with two electrosurgical devices, an electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing device (EBVS) and ultrasonic coagulation shears. Acute study animals underwent surgical bile duct sealing followed by immediate burst pressure testing. Chronic study animals were maintained for 1 week postoperatively and then tested.

RESULTS

The seal failure rate in the acute study was 50% for both the EBVS device and shears, and 0% for the laparoscopic surgical clip device used as a control. The latter had significantly higher burst pressures (646.2 ± 281.8 mmHg; P = 0.006) than the EBVS device (97.6 ± 86.6 mmHg) and shears (71.7 ± 89.3 mmHg). No significant difference in burst pressures was noted between the EBVS device and shears (97.6 ± 86.6 mmHg vs. 71.7 ± 89.3 mmHg). In the chronic study, obvious bile leaks occurred in one of four pigs (25%) in the EBVS device subgroup and two of four pigs (50%) in the shears subgroup. The average proximal CBD pressure in seven pigs was 16.1 ± 4.1 mmHg. The average chronic burst pressure in the control subgroup was 1088.0 ± 922.6 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high rates of failure of the EBVS device and the shears in consistently sealing biliary ducts, we do not recommend their routine use in biliary surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估两种电外科血管密封设备在胆道手术中的应用。

方法

采用电热双极血管密封装置(EBVS)和超声凝固剪对猪胆总管(CBD)进行密封。急性研究动物行手术胆管密封后立即进行爆裂压力测试。慢性研究动物术后维持 1 周,然后进行测试。

结果

急性研究中 EBVS 装置和剪刀的密封失败率均为 50%,而作为对照的腹腔镜手术夹装置的失败率为 0%。后者的爆裂压力明显更高(646.2 ± 281.8mmHg;P=0.006),明显高于 EBVS 装置(97.6 ± 86.6mmHg)和剪刀(71.7 ± 89.3mmHg)。EBVS 装置和剪刀的爆裂压力无显著差异(97.6 ± 86.6mmHg 与 71.7 ± 89.3mmHg)。在慢性研究中,EBVS 装置亚组中有 1 只猪(25%)和剪刀亚组中有 2 只猪(50%)出现明显胆汁泄漏。7 只猪的平均近端 CBD 压力为 16.1 ± 4.1mmHg。对照组的平均慢性爆裂压力为 1088.0 ± 922.6mmHg。

结论

鉴于 EBVS 装置和剪刀在一致密封胆管方面的高失败率,我们不建议在胆道手术中常规使用。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of electrosurgical vessel-sealing devices in biliary tract surgery in a porcine model.
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Dec;12(10):703-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00240.x.
4
Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9932-x. Epub 2008 May 16.
6
Evaluation of the novel bipolar vessel sealing and cutting device BiCision® in a porcine model.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012 Nov;21(6):402-7. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2012.661373. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
7
Comparison of linear and torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for the sealing of medium- to large-sized arteries.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1165-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9113-8. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
8
PlasmaKinetic bipolar vessel sealing: burst pressures and thermal spread in an animal model.
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):107-10. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.107.
9
10
Bipolar electrosurgical vessel-sealing device with compressive force monitoring.
J Biomech Eng. 2014 Jun;136(6):061001. doi: 10.1115/1.4027269.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Harmonic scalpel.
JSLS. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):14-9. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12674612014301.
3
Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Aug;18(4):593-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0227.
6
Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection without cystic duct and artery clipping.
Am J Surg. 2006 May;191(5):718-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.029.
8
Laparoscopic splenectomy and LigaSure.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005 Aug;15(4):212-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000174550.94671.30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验