Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria, Gobierno de Aragón. Avda. Montañana, Zaragoza, Spain.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 Nov;57 Suppl 1:107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01364.x.
The control of animal salmonellosis is considered as a major objective in Europe and indirect ELISAs will be important tools for the implementation of control programs for this infection in pigs. We analyse the results yielded by three commercial ELISAs (Herdcheck Swine Salmonella, SALMOTYPE Pig Screen, and PrioCHECK Salmonella) on meat juice samples from a population of slaughter pigs of Aragon, NW Spain, to assess their efficacy using traditional and latent-class approaches. Overall, the Herdcheck Swine Salmonella detected more Salmonella-infected pigs than the other two tests, but its relative sensitivity was low (65.9%). A similar result was observed when only serotypes detectable by this test were considered (69.1%). When a Bayesian approach was used the Herdcheck Swine Salmonella showed also the highest overall accuracy (sensitivity = 88% and specificity = 74%). Our results suggest that a relatively small proportion of the observed prevalence in herds would be explained by using these ELISAs. Also, this study points out that when different ELISA tests are used within the same herd, results may differ substantially. Thus, caution is advised if it is decided to use these assays for herd health classification in Spanish Salmonella control programs.
动物沙门氏菌病的控制被认为是欧洲的主要目标,间接 ELISA 将是在猪中实施这种感染控制计划的重要工具。我们分析了来自西班牙西北部阿拉贡屠宰猪群的肉汁样本中三种商业 ELISA(Herdcheck 猪沙门氏菌、SALMOTYPE 猪筛查和 PrioCHECK 沙门氏菌)的结果,使用传统和潜在类别方法评估它们的效果。总体而言,Herdcheck 猪沙门氏菌检测到的感染沙门氏菌的猪比其他两种检测方法多,但相对敏感性较低(65.9%)。当仅考虑该检测方法可检测到的血清型时,观察到类似的结果(69.1%)。当使用贝叶斯方法时,Herdcheck 猪沙门氏菌也显示出最高的总体准确性(敏感性=88%,特异性=74%)。我们的研究结果表明,使用这些 ELISA 解释观察到的畜群中相对较小比例的流行情况。此外,本研究指出,当在同一畜群中使用不同的 ELISA 检测时,结果可能会有很大差异。因此,如果决定在西班牙沙门氏菌控制计划中使用这些检测来对畜群健康进行分类,应谨慎行事。