• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业人员为何热衷于参与医疗机构认证?

What motivates professionals to engage in the accreditation of healthcare organizations?

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Feb;23(1):8-14. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq069. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzq069
PMID:21084322
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Motivated staff are needed to improve quality and safety in healthcare organizations. Stimulating and engaging staff to participate in accreditation processes is a considerable challenge. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of health executives, managers and frontline clinicians who participated in organizational accreditation processes: what motivated them to engage, and what benefits accrued?

DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: The setting was a large public teaching hospital undergoing a planned review of its accreditation status. A research protocol was employed to conduct semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 30 staff with varied organizational roles, from different professions, to discuss their involvement in accreditation. Thematic analysis of the data was undertaken.

RESULTS

The analysis identified three categories, each with sub-themes: accreditation response (reactions to accreditation and the value of surveys); survey issues (participation in the survey, learning through interactions and constraints) and documentation issues (self-assessment report, survey report and recommendations). Participants' occupational role focuses their attention to prioritize aspects of the accreditation process. Their motivations to participate and the benefits that accrue to them can be positively self-reinforcing. Participants have a desire to engage collaboratively with colleagues to learn and validate their efforts to improve.

CONCLUSION

Participation in the accreditation process promoted a quality and safety culture that crossed organizational boundaries. The insights into worker motivation can be applied to engage staff to promote learning, overcome organizational boundaries and improve services. The findings can be applied to enhance involvement with accreditation and, more broadly, to other quality and safety activities.

摘要

目的

需要激励员工以提高医疗机构的质量和安全性。激励和吸引员工参与认证过程是一项艰巨的挑战。本研究的目的是探讨参与组织认证过程的卫生行政人员、管理人员和一线临床医生的经验:他们的参与动机是什么,以及获得了哪些收益?

设计/参与者:该研究的背景是一家大型公立教学医院,正在计划对其认证状态进行审查。采用研究方案,对来自不同专业、具有不同组织角色的 30 名员工进行了半结构化访谈,以讨论他们参与认证的情况。对数据进行了主题分析。

结果

分析确定了三个类别,每个类别都有子主题:认证反应(对认证的反应和调查的价值);调查问题(参与调查、通过互动学习和约束)和文件问题(自我评估报告、调查报告和建议)。参与者的职业角色将他们的注意力集中在优先考虑认证过程的各个方面。他们参与的动机和获得的收益可以自我强化。参与者有与同事合作学习和验证他们改进努力的愿望。

结论

参与认证过程促进了跨越组织边界的质量和安全文化。对工人动机的深入了解可以用于激励员工,以促进学习、克服组织障碍和改进服务。这些发现可用于加强与认证的参与,更广泛地用于其他质量和安全活动。

相似文献

1
What motivates professionals to engage in the accreditation of healthcare organizations?专业人员为何热衷于参与医疗机构认证?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Feb;23(1):8-14. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq069. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
2
Relationships between change and organizational culture in hospitals.医院变革与组织文化之间的关系。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):191-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00166.x.
3
Are accreditation surveys reliable?认证调查可靠吗?
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22(2):105-16. doi: 10.1108/09526860910944601.
4
Accreditation: a cultural control strategy.认证:一种文化控制策略。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2008;21(2):146-58. doi: 10.1108/09526860810859012.
5
Hospital response to public reporting of quality indicators.医院对质量指标公开报告的回应。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):61-76.
6
Journey of a Hong Kong public teaching hospital in preparation of hospital accreditation.香港公立医院迎接评审的准备历程
Hong Kong Med J. 2011 Jun;17(3):231-6.
7
Evaluating the impact of accreditation on Brazilian healthcare organizations: A quantitative study.评估认证对巴西医疗保健机构的影响:一项定量研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):713-721. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx094.
8
Evaluating the benefits and limitations of an accreditation system.评估认证体系的益处与局限性。
World Hosp Health Serv. 1995;31(1):31-5.
9
Hospital accreditation: staff experiences and perceptions.医院评审:员工的经历与看法
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Jun 11;31(5):420-427. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2017-0115.
10
Benefits of participating in accreditation surveying.参与认证评审的益处。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(2):141-52. doi: 10.1108/09526861011017076.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare professionals' perceptions about implementing accreditation as a strategy to improve healthcare quality and organisational performance: a cross-sectional survey study.医疗保健专业人员对实施认证作为提高医疗质量和组织绩效策略的看法:一项横断面调查研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320664. eCollection 2025.
2
Explaining the barriers and facilitators of the accreditation process in maternity departments.解释产科部门认证过程中的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 17;24(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02825-3.
3
Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions.
轻松获得认证:医疗机构分步指南。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Oct 10;7(4):232-235. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-X5. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Evaluating the Impact of Hospital Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture in Saudi Arabia Healthcare Facilities.评估医院评审对沙特阿拉伯医疗机构患者安全文化的影响。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Nov 2;17:5021-5033. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S480496. eCollection 2024.
5
Rethinking Healthcare Quality and Prestige: Is This a Manager's Number One Problem?重新思考医疗保健质量和声誉:这是管理者面临的首要问题吗?
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;10:863383. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.863383. eCollection 2022.
6
A focused ethnography in the context of a European cancer research hospital accreditation program.以一家欧洲癌症研究医院认证项目为背景的集中民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 11;21(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06466-5.
7
Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review.理解审核如何以及为何能改善医院护理质量:系统的现实主义综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248677. eCollection 2021.
8
Promoting leadership and quality improvement through external inspections of management of sepsis in Norwegian hospitals: a focus group study.通过对挪威医院脓毒症管理的外部检查促进领导力和质量改进:一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 12;10(11):e041997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041997.
9
Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.受外部评估影响的医疗机构变革的中介因素:系统评价与叙述性综合。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 30;10(8):e038850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850.
10
Certification as support for resilience? Behind the curtains of a certification body - a qualitative study.认证是否能支持韧性?认证机构背后的故事——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05608-5.