• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国放射学会适宜性标准©卵巢癌筛查。

ACR appropriateness criteria© ovarian cancer screening.

作者信息

Brown Douglas L, Andreotti Rochelle F, Lee Susanna I, Dejesus Allison Sandra O, Bennett Genevieve L, Dubinsky Theodore, Glanc Phyllis, Horrow Mindy M, Lev-Toaff Anna S, Horowitz Neil S, Podrasky Ann E, Scoutt Leslie M, Zelop Carolyn M

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Ultrasound Q. 2010 Dec;26(4):219-23. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181fdd604.

DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181fdd604
PMID:21084936
Abstract

The majority of women with ovarian cancer have advanced stage disease at the time of diagnosis and a poor 5 year survival rate. Hence, screening has been investigated in the hopes of improving survival by diagnosing ovarian cancer at an earlier stage. Most screening methods thus far have included ultrasound and/or serum tumor markers. However, low prevalence of the disease, high false positive rate of current screening methods, and the probable rapid growth of most ovarian carcinomas from no defined precursor lesion, all contribute to difficulty in screening for ovarian cancer. While screening may be able to detect ovarian cancer at an earlier stage, adequate data is presently lacking on whether screening improves survival. The results of ongoing large clinical trials will be available in a few years and should provide critical information regarding the usefulness of screening. Pending results of those large clinical trials, screening is not currently recommended for women at average risk for ovarian cancer. Screening is most likely to be performed in women with an increased familial risk of ovarian cancer, but patients should be aware that even with this risk factor, there is currently insufficient evidence to know if screening is effective. New screening methods, including new or multiple serum markers and proteomics, are also being investigated.

摘要

大多数卵巢癌女性在确诊时已处于晚期,5年生存率较低。因此,人们对筛查进行了研究,希望通过早期诊断卵巢癌来提高生存率。迄今为止,大多数筛查方法包括超声检查和/或血清肿瘤标志物检测。然而,该疾病的低发病率、当前筛查方法的高假阳性率以及大多数卵巢癌可能从无明确前驱病变迅速发展,这些都导致了卵巢癌筛查的困难。虽然筛查可能能够在早期检测出卵巢癌,但目前缺乏关于筛查是否能提高生存率的充分数据。正在进行的大型临床试验结果将在几年后得出,应该会提供有关筛查有效性的关键信息。在这些大型临床试验结果出来之前,目前不建议对卵巢癌平均风险的女性进行筛查。筛查最有可能在卵巢癌家族风险增加的女性中进行,但患者应该意识到,即使有这个风险因素,目前也没有足够的证据来确定筛查是否有效。新的筛查方法,包括新的或多种血清标志物以及蛋白质组学,也正在研究中。

相似文献

1
ACR appropriateness criteria© ovarian cancer screening.美国放射学会适宜性标准©卵巢癌筛查。
Ultrasound Q. 2010 Dec;26(4):219-23. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181fdd604.
2
Ovarian cancer screening: a look at the evidence.卵巢癌筛查:审视相关证据。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Feb;10(1):77-81. doi: 10.1188/06.CJON.77-81.
3
How appropriate are the american college of radiology appropriateness criteria for ovarian cancer screening.美国放射学会卵巢癌筛查适宜性标准的适宜程度如何?
Ultrasound Q. 2010 Dec;26(4):225-6. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181fe2976.
4
Soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) [corrected] and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) as screening and diagnostic tests for epithelial ovarian cancer.可溶性表皮生长因子受体(sEGFR)[校正后]和癌抗原125(CA125)作为上皮性卵巢癌的筛查和诊断检测。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Feb;14(2):306-18. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0423.
5
Screening and detection of ovarian cancer.卵巢癌的筛查与检测
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;50(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.10.002.
6
Ovarian cancer screening. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.卵巢癌筛查。美国放射学会。ACR适宜性标准。
Radiology. 2000 Jun;215 Suppl:861-71.
7
The value of cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) during treatment and follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer.癌抗原125(CA 125)在卵巢癌患者治疗及随访过程中的价值。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Feb;9(1):8-13.
8
[Mass-screening for ovarian cancer].[卵巢癌大规模筛查]
Nihon Rinsho. 2004 Oct;62 Suppl 10:601-4.
9
Screening for ovarian cancer: is it worth the risk?卵巢癌筛查:值得冒这个风险吗?
Nurs Times. 1999;95(3):52-3.
10
[Screening for ovarian cancer].[卵巢癌筛查]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000 May 10;120(12):1444-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Contraception as chemoprevention of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 women.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变女性的避孕措施作为卵巢癌的化学预防。
Hormones (Athens). 2024 Jun;23(2):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s42000-023-00519-6. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Stratifying Ovarian Cancer Risk Using Personal Health Data.利用个人健康数据分层评估卵巢癌风险
Front Big Data. 2019 Jul 2;2:24. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00024. eCollection 2019.
3
VSV based virotherapy in ovarian cancer: the past, the present and …future?基于水泡性口炎病毒的卵巢癌病毒疗法:过去、现在及……未来?
J Cancer. 2017 Jul 22;8(12):2369-2383. doi: 10.7150/jca.19473. eCollection 2017.
4
An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer.正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)和正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MRI)在卵巢癌中作用的最新进展。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):1079-1091. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3638-z. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
5
Biomarker testing for ovarian cancer: clinical utility of multiplex assays.卵巢癌的生物标志物检测:多重分析的临床效用。
Mol Diagn Ther. 2013 Jun;17(3):139-46. doi: 10.1007/s40291-013-0027-6.
6
Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.卵巢癌的蛋白质生物标志物:只见树木,不见森林。
Future Oncol. 2012 Jan;8(1):55-71. doi: 10.2217/fon.11.135.