Suppr超能文献

贝恩、ADE和封闭式马吉尔呼吸系统。控制通气期间的一项比较研究。

The Bain, ADE, and Enclosed Magill breathing systems. A comparative study during controlled ventilation.

作者信息

Criswell J, McKenzie S, Day S, Disley J, Bruce W E, Soni N

机构信息

Magill Department of Anaesthetics, Westminster Hospital, London.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1990 Feb;45(2):113-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14273.x.

Abstract

The Enclosed Magill, Humphrey ADE and the Bain breathing systems are all used for controlled ventilation of the lungs. This study compares the three systems in vitro with a lung model and in clinical practice. No difference was observed, with ventilatory variables commonly used in clinical practice, between the Bain and the ADE, while significantly lower end-tidal carbon dioxide values were observed with the Enclosed Magill (about 7%). Lower fresh gas flows can be used under these circumstances to maintain normocapnia with the Enclosed Magill than either the Bain or the Humphrey ADE.

摘要

封闭式麦吉尔、汉弗莱ADE和贝恩呼吸回路均用于肺的控制通气。本研究在体外使用肺模型以及在临床实践中对这三种呼吸回路进行了比较。在临床实践中常用的通气变量方面,未观察到贝恩和ADE之间存在差异,而封闭式麦吉尔的呼气末二氧化碳值显著更低(约低7%)。在这些情况下,与贝恩或汉弗莱ADE相比,使用封闭式麦吉尔时可以采用更低的新鲜气流来维持正常二氧化碳水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验