Shah N K, Loughlin C J, Bedford R F
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
Br J Anaesth. 1989 Feb;62(2):150-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/62.2.150.
It has been suggested that Humphrey's ADE system may be an improvement on the Bain system. To compare their efficiencies we have studied 20 anesthetized adults who had controlled ventilation established with a circle absorber system at a VE sufficient to maintain normocapnia. Patients were then randomly allocated to either a Bain or an ADE system. Fresh gas flow was sufficient to keep PE'CO2 constant for 30 min. The other circuit was then used for an additional 30 min. The required FGF was 54 ml kg-1 min-1 for the Bain system, compared with 67 ml kg-1 min-1 for the ADE system. We conclude that, during controlled ventilation, the ADE system is 25% less efficient than the Bain system.
有人提出汉弗莱的ADE系统可能是对贝恩系统的一种改进。为了比较它们的效率,我们研究了20名接受麻醉的成年人,这些人通过循环吸收系统建立了控制通气,潮气量足以维持正常碳酸血症。然后将患者随机分配到贝恩系统或ADE系统。新鲜气体流量足以使呼气末二氧化碳分压在30分钟内保持恒定。然后使用另一个回路再持续30分钟。贝恩系统所需的新鲜气体流量为54毫升/千克/分钟,而ADE系统为67毫升/千克/分钟。我们得出结论,在控制通气期间,ADE系统的效率比贝恩系统低25%。