Department of Neurosurgery, KAT National Hospital, Attica, Greece.
J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;114(2):545-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091685. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mannitol and hypertonic saline in doses of similar osmotic burden for the treatment of intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
The authors used an alternating treatment protocol to compare the effect of hypertonic saline with that of mannitol given for episodes of increased intracranial pressure in patients treated for severe head injury at their hospital during 2006-2008. Standard guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury were followed. Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) was treated either with mannitol or hypertonic saline. Doses of similar osmotic burden (mannitol 20%, 2 ml/kg, infused over 20 minutes, or saline 15%, 0.42 ml/kg, administered as a bolus via a central venous catheter) were given alternately to the individual patient with severe brain injury during episodes of increased pressure. The dependent variables were the extent and duration of reduction of increased ICP. The choice of agent for treatment of the initial hypertensive event was determined on a randomized basis; treatment was alternated for every subsequent event in each individual patient. Reduction of ICP and duration of action were recorded after each event. Results obtained after mannitol administration were statistically compared with those obtained after hypertonic saline administration.
Data pertaining to 199 hypertensive events in 29 patients were collected. The mean decrease in ICP obtained with mannitol was 7.96 mm Hg and that obtained with hypertonic saline was 8.43 mm Hg (p = 0.586, equal variances assumed). The mean duration of effect was 3 hours 33 minutes for mannitol and 4 hours 17 minutes for hypertonic saline (p = 0.40, equal variances assumed).
No difference between the 2 medications could be found with respect to the extent of reduction of ICP or duration of action.
本研究旨在比较甘露醇和高渗盐水在相似渗透压负荷剂量下治疗严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内高压的效果。
作者使用交替治疗方案比较了 2006-2008 年期间在他们医院治疗的严重头部损伤患者中高渗盐水与甘露醇治疗颅内压升高的效果。遵循严重创伤性脑损伤的标准管理指南。升高的颅内压(ICP)用甘露醇或高渗盐水治疗。对严重脑损伤患者的每个发作,交替给予剂量相似的渗透压负荷(甘露醇 20%,2ml/kg,输注 20 分钟,或盐水 15%,0.42ml/kg,通过中心静脉导管推注)。初始高血压事件的治疗药物选择基于随机原则;每个患者的每个后续事件都交替治疗。记录每次事件后 ICP 的降低程度和作用持续时间。甘露醇给药后的结果与高渗盐水给药后的结果进行了统计学比较。
共收集了 29 例患者 199 次高血压事件的数据。甘露醇治疗后 ICP 的平均降低值为 7.96mmHg,高渗盐水治疗后为 8.43mmHg(p=0.586,方差相等假设)。甘露醇的作用持续时间为 3 小时 33 分钟,高渗盐水为 4 小时 17 分钟(p=0.40,方差相等假设)。
在 ICP 降低程度或作用持续时间方面,两种药物之间没有差异。