• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于体重给药与固定剂量23.4%高渗盐水用于重型颅脑损伤患者降低颅内压的比较

Comparison of Weight-Based Dosing versus Fixed Dosing of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline for Intracranial Pressure Reduction in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Busey Kirsten, Ferreira Jason, Aldridge Petra, Crandall Marie, Johnson Donald

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, University of Florida Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Center for Health Equity and Quality Research, University of Florida Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):252-256. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_66_19. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

DOI:10.4103/JETS.JETS_66_19
PMID:33897140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8047962/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Hypertonic saline (HTS) is a pharmacologic therapy used in patients with severe traumatic brain injuries to decrease intracranial pressure (ICP) associated with cerebral edema.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare ICP reduction between fixed doses of 23.4% HTS and weight-based doses.

SETTING AND DESIGN

This was a retrospective study that included adult patients at a level 1 trauma center who had nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury, an ICP monitor, and received at least one dose of 23.4% HTS.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Doses were classified as either high weight-based (>0.6 ml/kg), low weight-based (<0.6 ml/kg), or standard fixed dose (30 ml). Only doses given within 5 days post-injury were evaluated. Percent reduction in ICP was compared pre- and post-dose between dosing groups, and each dose was evaluated as a separate episode.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary and secondary endpoints for the study were analyzed using mixed-model, repeated-measures analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

A total of 97 doses of HTS were evaluated. The primary endpoint of ICP reduction showed a 42.5% decrease in ICP after the administration of a high weight-based dose, a 36.7% reduction after a low weight-based dose, and a 31.5% reduction after a fixed dose. There was no significant relationship between dose group and percent change in ICP ( = 0.25). A sub-analysis of doses received within 48 h postinjury found a significant relationship between both dose group and percent change in ICP, and initial ICP and percent change in ICP ( = 0.04, and <0.0001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data did not show a significant difference between fixed- and weight-based doses of 23.4% HTS for ICP reduction.

摘要

背景

高渗盐水(HTS)是一种用于重度创伤性脑损伤患者的药物治疗方法,以降低与脑水肿相关的颅内压(ICP)。

目的

本研究的目的是比较固定剂量的23.4% HTS和基于体重的剂量在降低ICP方面的效果。

设置与设计

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了一级创伤中心的成年患者,这些患者患有非穿透性创伤性脑损伤,有ICP监测器,并接受了至少一剂23.4% HTS。

研究对象与方法

剂量分为高体重剂量(>0.6 ml/kg)、低体重剂量(<0.6 ml/kg)或标准固定剂量(30 ml)。仅评估受伤后5天内给予的剂量。比较给药组给药前后ICP的降低百分比,每个剂量作为一个单独的事件进行评估。

统计分析

使用混合模型重复测量协方差分析对研究的主要和次要终点进行分析。

结果

共评估了97剂HTS。降低ICP的主要终点显示,高体重剂量给药后ICP降低42.5%,低体重剂量给药后降低36.7%,固定剂量给药后降低31.5%。剂量组与ICP变化百分比之间无显著关系(P = 0.25)。对受伤后48小时内接受的剂量进行的亚分析发现,剂量组与ICP变化百分比以及初始ICP与ICP变化百分比之间均存在显著关系(分别为P = 0.04和P<0.0001)。

结论

我们的数据显示,23.4% HTS的固定剂量和基于体重的剂量在降低ICP方面没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Weight-Based Dosing versus Fixed Dosing of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline for Intracranial Pressure Reduction in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.基于体重给药与固定剂量23.4%高渗盐水用于重型颅脑损伤患者降低颅内压的比较
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):252-256. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_66_19. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Hypertonic saline reduces cumulative and daily intracranial pressure burdens after severe traumatic brain injury.高渗盐水可降低重度创伤性脑损伤后的颅内压累积负担和每日负担。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):202-10. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132545.
3
The use of 23.4% hypertonic saline for the management of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.23.4%高渗盐水用于重度创伤性脑损伤患者颅内压升高的治疗:一项初步研究。
J Trauma. 2009 Aug;67(2):277-82. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181acc726.
4
The impact of hypertonic saline on cerebrovascular reactivity and compensatory reserve in traumatic brain injury: an exploratory analysis.高渗盐水对创伤性脑损伤患者脑血管反应性和代偿储备能力的影响:一项探索性分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Nov;162(11):2683-2693. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04579-0. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Comparison of Intracranial Pressure Measurements Before and After Hypertonic Saline or Mannitol Treatment in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.比较儿童严重颅脑损伤患者高渗盐水或甘露醇治疗前后的颅内压测量值。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220891. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0891.
6
Hypertonic Saline is Superior to Mannitol for the Combined Effect on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Burdens in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.高渗盐水优于甘露醇对严重颅脑损伤患者颅内压和脑灌注压负担的综合影响。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):221-230. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz046.
7
Responsiveness to therapy for increased intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury is associated with neurological outcome.创伤性脑损伤中颅内压升高对治疗的反应与神经学预后相关。
Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):2084-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.041. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
8
Hyperosmolar therapy in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study.儿童创伤性脑损伤的高渗疗法:一项回顾性研究。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Dec;32(12):2363-2368. doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3231-y. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
9
Safety and efficacy of repeated doses of 14.6 or 23.4 % hypertonic saline for refractory intracranial hypertension.重复剂量的14.6%或23.4%高渗盐水治疗难治性颅内高压的安全性和有效性。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):436-42. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9907-1.
10
Standardized Volume Dosing Protocol of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline for Pediatric Critical Care: Initial Experience.儿童危重病 23.4%高渗盐水标准化容量给药方案:初步经验。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Sep;54(9):866-871. doi: 10.1177/1060028020907997. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Cat owners do not provide more reliable weight estimates for cats compared with veterinary professionals in an emergency setting.在紧急情况下,与兽医专业人员相比,猫主人对猫体重的估计并不更可靠。
J Feline Med Surg. 2024 Apr;26(4):1098612X241240321. doi: 10.1177/1098612X241240321.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition.《重型颅脑损伤管理指南(第四版)》
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
2
Higher-volume hypertonic saline and increased thrombotic risk in pediatric traumatic brain injury.高容量高渗盐水与小儿创伤性脑损伤中血栓形成风险增加
J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.07.022. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Marked reduction in mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率显著降低。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;119(6):1583-90. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13276. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
4
Safety and efficacy of repeated doses of 14.6 or 23.4 % hypertonic saline for refractory intracranial hypertension.重复剂量的14.6%或23.4%高渗盐水治疗难治性颅内高压的安全性和有效性。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):436-42. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9907-1.
5
High-osmolarity saline in neurocritical care: systematic review and meta-analysis.高渗盐水在神经危重症中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1353-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827ca4b3.
6
Intravenous hypertonic saline use in the pediatric emergency department.小儿急诊科静脉输注高渗盐水的应用
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):71-3. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b54c3.
7
Osmotherapy: use among neurointensivists.渗透疗法:神经重症医师的应用。
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Apr;14(2):222-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9477-4.
8
Comparison of mannitol and hypertonic saline in the treatment of severe brain injuries.甘露醇和高渗盐水治疗重型颅脑损伤的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;114(2):545-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091685. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
9
Hypertonic saline and its effect on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain tissue oxygen.高渗盐水及其对颅内压、脑灌注压和脑组织氧的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6):1035-41; discussion 1041-2. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000359533.16214.04.
10
The use of 23.4% hypertonic saline for the management of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.23.4%高渗盐水用于重度创伤性脑损伤患者颅内压升高的治疗:一项初步研究。
J Trauma. 2009 Aug;67(2):277-82. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181acc726.