Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2381-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03175.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
To evaluate the effect of nonresponse bias on reports of the quality of end-of-life care that older adults receive.
Nationwide retrospective survey of end-of-life care.
Sixty-two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
Patients were eligible if they died in a participating facility. One family member per patient was selected from medical records and invited to participate.
The telephone survey included 14 items describing important aspects of the patient's care in the last month of life. Scores (0-100) reflect the percentage of items for which the family member reported that the patient received the best possible care, and a global item defined the proportion of families who said the patient received "excellent" care. To examine the effect of nonresponse bias, a model was created to predict the likelihood of response based on patient and family characteristics; then this model was used to apply weights that were equivalent to the inverse of the probability of response for that individual.
Interviews were completed with family members of 3,897 of 7,110 patients (55%). Once results were weighted to account for nonresponse bias, the change in mean individual scores was 2% of families reporting "excellent" care. Of the 62 facilities in the sample, the scores of only 19 facilities (31%) changed more than 1% in either direction, and only 10 (16%) changed more than 2%.
Although nonresponse bias is a theoretical concern, it does not appear to have a significant effect on the facility-level results of this retrospective family survey.
评估非应答偏倚对老年人接受临终关怀质量报告的影响。
对临终关怀进行的全国性回顾性调查。
62 家退伍军人事务医疗中心。
如果患者在参与的机构中死亡,则符合条件。从病历中选择每位患者的一名家属,并邀请他们参与。
电话调查包括 14 个项目,描述了患者生命最后一个月护理的重要方面。得分(0-100)反映了家属报告患者接受最佳护理的项目比例,并且一个整体项目定义了表示患者接受“优秀”护理的家庭比例。为了检查无应答偏倚的影响,创建了一个模型,根据患者和家庭特征预测应答的可能性;然后,该模型用于应用与个人应答概率成反比的权重。
完成了对 7110 名患者中的 3897 名患者的家属进行的访谈(55%)。一旦对结果进行加权以考虑无应答偏倚,报告“优秀”护理的家庭的平均个人得分变化了 2%。在样本中的 62 家机构中,只有 19 家机构(31%)的分数在任何方向上变化超过 1%,只有 10 家(16%)的分数变化超过 2%。
尽管无应答偏倚是一个理论上的问题,但它似乎对这种回顾性家庭调查的机构水平结果没有重大影响。