Institution of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Sweden.
Acta Oncol. 2011 Jun;50(5):642-7. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.554434. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
Quality in health care is important to measure and palliative care is no exception. The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) is a national quality register that focuses on the last week of life. It collects data with an end-of-life questionnaire (ELQ), which is validated in this study.
This study included 169 consecutive patients who had died at a palliative unit. That unit had developed a computerized end-of-life medical record module that enabled a comparison between reported data and medical records, illustrating the validity of the registry questionnaire. The paper versions of the ELQs filled in at the unit were also inspected to determine the extent of registration mistakes when completing the web questionnaire.
Data from the medical records and data from the ELQs reported to the SRPC showed a congruity of 22 to 100%. A working limit of acceptable congruity was set to 80%. Eight questions fell below that line. Some of these differences were caused by systematic errors. The paper versions filled in at the unit and the data from the ELQs reported to the SRPC had a congruity of between 96% and 100%, with the exception of one question about pain evaluation, which had 91% congruity.
The results in this study will be used to improve and further develop the register. Some questions need to be more specific to promote more valid registrations. Consensus on quality issues in end-of-life care would simplify the work of writing and answering the questionnaire. It is desirable to perform a similar study at hospital wards that do not specialize in palliative care; however, the anticipated lack of palliative documentation could make such a study difficult to perform.
医疗保健质量很重要,姑息治疗也不例外。瑞典姑息治疗登记处(SRPC)是一个专注于生命最后一周的国家质量登记处。它使用生命末期问卷(ELQ)收集数据,本研究对其进行了验证。
本研究包括在姑息治疗病房死亡的 169 名连续患者。该病房开发了一个计算机化的生命末期医疗记录模块,使报告的数据与医疗记录之间能够进行比较,说明了登记问卷的有效性。还检查了在病房填写的 ELQ 的纸质版本,以确定在填写网络问卷时登记错误的程度。
来自医疗记录的数据和向 SRPC 报告的 ELQ 数据之间的一致性为 22%至 100%。设定可接受的一致性工作限值为 80%。有 8 个问题低于该线。这些差异中的一些是由系统错误引起的。在病房填写的纸质版本和向 SRPC 报告的 ELQ 数据之间的一致性在 96%至 100%之间,只有一个关于疼痛评估的问题一致性为 91%。
本研究的结果将用于改进和进一步开发登记处。有些问题需要更加具体,以促进更有效的登记。在生命末期护理的质量问题上达成共识将简化编写和回答问卷的工作。在不专门从事姑息治疗的病房进行类似的研究是可取的;然而,预计姑息治疗文件的缺乏可能使这样的研究难以进行。