Korey Stringer Institute, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Dec;24(12):3488-96. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181fb3e15.
Body cooling has become common in athletics, with numerous studies looking at different cooling modalities and different types of exercise. A search of the literature revealed 14 studies that measured performance following cooling intervention and had acceptable protocols for exercise and performance measures. These studies were objectively analyzed with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, and 13 of the studies were included in this review. These studies revealed that body cooling by various modalities had consistent and greater impact on aerobic exercise performance (mean increase in performance = 4.25%) compared to anaerobic (mean increase in performance = 0.66%). Different cooling modalities, and cooling during different points during an exercise protocol, had extremely varied results. In conclusion, body cooling seems to have a positive effect on aerobic performance, although the impact on anaerobic performance may vary and often does not provide the same positive effect.
身体冷却在运动中已很常见,许多研究都在探讨不同的冷却方式和不同类型的运动。文献检索发现,有 14 项研究在冷却干预后测量了运动表现,并且有可接受的运动和表现测量方案。这些研究使用物理治疗证据数据库 (PEDro) 量表进行了客观分析,其中 13 项研究被纳入了综述。这些研究表明,各种方式的身体冷却对有氧运动表现有一致且更大的影响(平均表现提高=4.25%),相比之下,对无氧运动的影响较小(平均表现提高=0.66%)。不同的冷却方式,以及在运动方案的不同时间点进行冷却,会产生非常不同的结果。总之,身体冷却似乎对有氧运动表现有积极影响,尽管对无氧运动表现的影响可能不同,而且通常不会产生相同的积极影响。