一项系统评价评估了美国和加拿大的痴呆症疾病经济负担研究在制定政策方面的相关性。

A systematic review to assess the policy-making relevance of dementia cost-of-illness studies in the US and Canada.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 50 Main Street East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Feb;29(2):141-56. doi: 10.2165/11539450-000000000-00000.

Abstract

A systematic review of dementia cost-of-illness (COI) studies in the US and Canada was conducted to explore the policy-making relevance of these studies. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EconLit, AMED and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2010 for English-language COI articles. Content analysis was used to extract common themes about dementia cost from the conclusions of articles that passed title, abstract and full-text screening. These themes informed our exploration of the policy-making relevance of COI studies in dementia. The literature search retrieved 961 articles and data were extracted from 46 articles. All except three articles reported data from the US; 27 articles included Alzheimer's dementia only. Common themes pertained to general observations about dementia cost, cost drivers in dementia, caregiver cost, items that may lower dementia cost, social service cost, Medicare and Medicaid cost, and cost comparisons with other diseases. The common themes suggest policy-oriented research for the future. However, the extracted COI studies were typically not conducted for policy-making purposes and they did not commonly provide prescriptive policy options. Researchers and policy makers need to consider whether the optimal research focus in dementia should be on programme evaluations instead of more COI studies.

摘要

对美国和加拿大的痴呆症疾病负担(COI)研究进行了系统回顾,以探讨这些研究对决策的相关性。从建库到 2010 年 3 月,检索了 MEDLINE、CINAHL、EconLit、AMED 和 Cochrane Library 以获取英文 COI 文章。通过对通过标题、摘要和全文筛选的文章的结论进行内容分析,提取了有关痴呆症成本的常见主题。这些主题为我们探讨痴呆症 COI 研究对决策的相关性提供了信息。文献检索检索到 961 篇文章,从 46 篇文章中提取了数据。除了三篇文章外,所有文章都报告了来自美国的数据;27 篇文章仅包括阿尔茨海默病。常见主题涉及痴呆症成本的一般观察、痴呆症成本的驱动因素、照顾者成本、可能降低痴呆症成本的项目、社会服务成本、医疗保险和医疗补助成本以及与其他疾病的成本比较。这些常见主题表明未来需要面向政策的研究。然而,提取的 COI 研究通常不是为决策目的而进行的,它们通常没有提供规范性的政策选择。研究人员和决策者需要考虑,在痴呆症中,最佳的研究重点是否应该是方案评估而不是更多的 COI 研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索