Suppr超能文献

创伤性体验在定义创伤性应激中的重要性。

The importance of the peritraumatic experience in defining traumatic stress.

机构信息

National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;137(1):47-67. doi: 10.1037/a0021353.

Abstract

In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev., DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2000), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Criterion A2 stipulates that an individual must experience intense fear, helplessness, or horror during an event that threatened the life or physical integrity of oneself or others to be eligible for the PTSD diagnosis. In considering this criterion, we describe its origins, review studies that have examined its predictive validity, and reflect on the intended purpose of the criterion and how it complements the mission of the DSM. We then assert that the predictive validity of Criterion A2 may not be an appropriate metric for evaluating its worth. We also note that the current Criterion A2 may not fully capture all the salient aspects of the traumatic stress response. To support this claim, we review empirical research showing that individuals adapt to extreme environmental events by responding in a complex and coordinated manner. This complex response set involves an individual's appraisal regarding the degree to which the event taxes his or her resources, as well as a range of other cognitions (e.g., dissociation), felt emotions (e.g., fear), physiological reactions (e.g., heart rate increase), and behaviors (e.g., tonic immobility). We provide evidence that these response components may be associated with the subsequent development of PTSD. We then describe the challenges associated with accurately assessing an individual's traumatic stress response. We conclude with a discussion of the need to consider the individual's immediate response when defining a traumatic stressor.

摘要

在《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(第四版修订版,DSM-IV-TR;美国精神病学协会,2000 年)中,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)标准 A2 规定,个体必须在威胁到自己或他人生命或身体完整性的事件中经历强烈的恐惧、无助或恐惧,才有资格诊断 PTSD。在考虑这一标准时,我们描述了它的起源,回顾了检查其预测有效性的研究,并反思了标准的预期目的以及它如何补充 DSM 的使命。然后我们断言,标准 A2 的预测有效性可能不是评估其价值的适当指标。我们还注意到,当前的标准 A2 可能无法完全捕捉到创伤性应激反应的所有显著方面。为了支持这一说法,我们回顾了实证研究,表明个体通过以复杂和协调的方式对极端环境事件做出反应来适应这些事件。这种复杂的反应集涉及个体对事件对其资源的消耗程度的评估,以及一系列其他认知(例如,分离)、感受情绪(例如,恐惧)、生理反应(例如,心率增加)和行为(例如,强直不动)。我们提供的证据表明,这些反应成分可能与 PTSD 的随后发展有关。然后我们描述了准确评估个体创伤性应激反应所面临的挑战。最后,我们讨论了在定义创伤性应激源时需要考虑个体的即时反应的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验