Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Photochem Photobiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;87(1):184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00835.x. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
To assist in the development of the 2008 Australian/New Zealand standard on solaria and related regulations, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency scientists visited a number of tanning establishments during 2008 to measure the intensity and spectral distribution of the ultraviolet radiation (UVR) emissions from a range of solaria. The 2002 Australian/New Zealand Standard "Solaria for cosmetic purposes" (AS/NZS 2635) allowed a maximum UVR output from solaria of UV Index 60, a compromise between the solarium industry who wanted no upper limit and the health agencies who wanted to limit intensity. Of the 20 solaria examined in detail, only one had emissions of intensity less than UV Index 12, typical of mid-latitude summer sunlight, 15 units emitted more than UV Index 20, while three units emitted at intensities above UV Index 36, the maximum allowed by the new standard, AS/NZS 2635 (2008) and would thus not comply. UVA emissions ranged from 98W·m(-2) up to a maximum of 438W·m(-2) , more than six times the UVA content of mid-latitude summer sunshine. The results indicate that solaria users in Australia have access to solaria that are high intensity units with both significantly higher UVB and UVA emissions than sunlight, with implications for resultant adverse health effects.
为协助制定 2008 年澳大利亚/新西兰日光浴沙龙及相关法规标准,澳大利亚辐射防护与核安全局的科学家们在 2008 年期间走访了一些日光浴沙龙,以测量来自各种日光浴设备的紫外线辐射(UVR)强度和光谱分布。2002 年澳大利亚/新西兰标准《日光浴沙龙的美容用途》(AS/NZS 2635)允许日光浴设备的最大紫外线辐射输出为 UV 指数 60,这是介于希望设定上限的日光浴沙龙行业和希望限制强度的健康机构之间的妥协。在详细检查的 20 个日光浴沙龙中,只有一个的强度排放低于 UV 指数 12,这是典型的中纬度夏季阳光强度,15 个单位的排放强度超过 UV 指数 20,而 3 个单位的排放强度超过新标准 AS/NZS 2635(2008)允许的 UV 指数 36,即最高限度,因此不符合标准。UVA 排放量从 98W·m(-2)到最高 438W·m(-2)不等,比中纬度夏季阳光的 UVA 含量高出六倍以上。结果表明,澳大利亚的日光浴使用者可以接触到高强度的日光浴设备,其 UVB 和 UVA 的排放量都明显高于阳光,这可能会对健康产生不利影响。